User talk:DocVM

WWIIOL Fanboi

Seriously, dude. The criticisms of the game are valid. You're defending the game because you play and want to see it do well and you're afraid that criticisms will negatively affect it. Unfortunately, CRS has some SERIOUS customer service issues. This is documented as well as anecdotal. Merely mentioning a "competing" (and I use the term with all due sarcasm) forum shouldn't be grounds for terminating a paying account, nor limiting the access one has to forums. True, it is their site and they can do whatever they want. But the fact that the *do* do it is noteworthy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrSpammy (talk • contribs) 22:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I have restored the article and redirected it to World War II Online, because they seem to be devepers of just the game and nothing else. There is already a short section in the article devoted to them. The page Cornered Rat Software may have potential for expansion to a full article, but as it was it didn't contain any useful information that wasn't already in the main article. (For the notability guidelines on companies and similar organizations, see WP:CORP; if you believe that it is notable enough for its own article, it should probably be discussed at the relevant talk page.) Regards, Mike Rosoft 15:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grand Falls Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Grand Falls Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Canada page block

The offer was to discuss issue of Canada's autonomy vis a vis Britain and the Monarchy on the Dominion page; that has spilled back here. The mediation page for that is here(Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Dominion). --soulscanner (talk) 11:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)