User talk:DocRocsMinions

Your New article

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed your new article and have moved it to Draft:Hox genes in amphibians and reptiles as this article is not ready for the main space, by leaving the work in the draft space you are able to edit it at your leisure without threat of deletion or lessen chance of interruption. Once you fell the article is ready you submit it for review and an experienced editor will review and approve or provide feedback on concerns. If you have any questions please feel free to as here as I will be watching this page for a response.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 21:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The source article apparently contains four figs. Where have you copied this article from? Under what copyright terms was the source released and why have you not uploaded the figs? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, DocRocsMinions, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 21:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "DocRocsMinions", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because "Minions" implies shared use. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 22:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hox genes in amphibians and reptiles (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This draft is currently a combination of declines, between (a) reading like an essay, (b) WP:NOTJOURNAL, and (c) the fact that Hox gene could easily be expanded with (some) of the information in this draft. I find no compelling reason to accept this draft (at this time) based on the above issues.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hox genes in amphibians and reptiles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DocRocsMinions, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DocRocsMinions! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A note for you

I've left a discussion at the talk page of the draft you've been working on. Please take a look. Primefac (talk) 20:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hello DocRocsMinions, I have blocked this account because with comments such as this one referring to you as "we", it's pretty obvious that this account is used by multiple people. That's not permitted; Wikipedia does not allow shared use of accounts. Each of you should create an account of their own. If you think this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. On an entirely unrelated note, please do not remove "Submission declined" notices from drafts as you did here. Those serve as a historical record until the draft is accepted and will make the next reviewer's task easier. Huon (talk) 22:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DocRocsMinions (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey sorry for the confusion. I am the only one using this account, no one else has access to my laptop or this account. If you can verify that somehow using IP adresses and Log on times please do. I have read the wikipedia guidelines and I assure you that I have not broken any guidelines. No one else is using this page except me. By 'we' I meant to say just 'me'. As you can see I have made a tremendous amount of mistakes in that sentence because I was rushing out of my class. Again sorry for the confusion. I have also taken this page very seriously and I am not a troll trying to give you a hard time. Please unblock me. PS my username is just an old nickname for my brother and I and it was the first unique thing that came to my mind. Have a good night. DocRocsMinions (talk) 23:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If this actually seemed like a simple miscommunication I would certainly give you the benefit of the doubt and unblock you...however that really just doesn't make sense. Looking at that sentence: "we", "our", "we", "ours", "we". Referring to yourself as multiple people five times in four sentences is not something one might do by mistake because they're in a rush. And the bizarre explanation that that's what happened makes it all the more suspect. So, sorry, I don't believe you. Rules are rules, you know how it is. You're still perfectly welcome here on Wikipedia and I hope you'll stay here, but please make a new account and don't share it with anyone or for that matter, act like you are. Swarm ^{we ♥ our hive} 04:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.