User talk:DocKino/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

ET

Thank you for the copyediting. Alientraveller 16:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Film Booking Offices of America image

If you're still around and retain any interest, would you mind weighing in on this—Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 August 21#Image:EvelynBrent1.jpg—however you see fit? Thanks much, Dan—DCGeist 00:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Oy, actually there seems to be a concerted effort to undermine the article. These images are also under attack: Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 August 23#Image:CowboyCopPoster.jpg‎; Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 August 23#Image:TarzanGoldenLion.jpg‎; Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 August 23#Image:FredThomsonFBO.jpg‎. Well...if you have the time and energy--I'm trying to muster it myself.—DCGeist 04:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks much for contributing to the discussion. Let me know if there's anything I can help you out with at any point. Best, Dan.—DCGeist 17:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of ALE-Uniform-BAL.PNG

This image, which we fought for, and which we proved belonged, was quickly deleted under false premises by an deletionist ally of those who fought for deletion. I'm beginning discussion for action at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball#Uniform_Images. It would be appreciated if you would join the cause.--Silent Wind of Doom 18:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I also believe the Carell image was deleted unfairly, and am bringing it to review as well. See Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Image:Carellcolbert_ds.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silent Wind of Doom (talk • contribs) 03:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Filmmaking Announcement

A PROPOSED PROJECT MERGER with WikiProject Films is under consideration. All opinions and questions are strongly encouraged! Girolamo Savonarola 01:18, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Another one to look at

Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Image:KinseyTIME.jpg. I believe the image was deleted entirely against the clear language and spirit of our deletion policy and guidelines. I'm pretty sure you know what an issue this is. Best, D—DCGeist 06:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Nice edits

On the articles on two of my favourite bands. Thank you. --John (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The Clash article has been rated as GA-Class

		The Music Barnstar
		I award the Music Barnstar to DocKino for your great job on The Clash article. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I've seen you around on Clash articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Clash, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Clash on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

"Know Your Rights"... Listen to this / Run ... to join us! Todo: Highest priority Expand all articles related to The Clash Fair use Add fair use rationale to all images and sound samples (all except images already labeled free use). Resize large "fair use" images to less than 300 pixels, @ 72dpi. Articles Try to expand all songs stubs if possible. Some song stubs can not be expanded and should be redirects to the album. See WP:NSONG. Expand album articles (all). Remove Trivia sections (trivia sections should be avoided in favor of presenting information within the framework of the article's main text). To Create: The Right Profile, Hate and War, What's My Name? (song), Cheat (song), Protex Blue, 48 Hours (song), Johnny Green (manager), List of awards and nominations received by The Clash, List of The Clash concerts, Category:The Clash tours... (see project pages Songs and List of The Clash concerts) To Destub: (see: Category:Stub-Class The Clash articles) To Expand: (see: Category:Start-Class The Clash articles and Category:C-Class The Clash articles) To Improve to GA-Class:: (see: Category:B-Class The Clash articles) To Improve to Featured standard:: (see: Category:GA-Class The Clash articles) To Nominate at WP:FAC: The Clash, London Calling Needing attention Current activity: Article alerts To Clean up: none (or all). Please, see: Cleanup listing Lists to complete: List of The Clash concerts, Genres Wanted Pics/Graphics: Gary Barnacle, Terry Chimes, Tymon Dogg, "Every Little Bit Hurts", Ellen Foley, "Groovy Times", The Latino Rockabilly War, Keith Levene, London SS, Ray Lowry, Sandy Pearlman, "Pressure Drop", Bill Price, Red Rockers, Bernard Rhodes, Nick Sheppard, Ray Staff, Strummerville, Kosmo Vinyl, Vince White (see: Category:The Clash articles needing photographs) Maintain: none (or all) Collaboration: none To Deorphan: none To Remove: none Project building Add WikiProject The Clash banner {{WPClash}} to all appropriate talk pages of all Clash-related articles. Add/update assessments for all project pages. Personally invite quality editors working on The Clash articles to join the project. Project Discussions: The Clash WP Talk If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log.

Film noir

My apologies if I was falsely insinuating you were a sockpuppet over on the film noir talk page. Can I assume, then, that you are someone who frequently collaborates with DCGeist? PBP (talk) 01:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Punk rock in Spain

A tag has been placed on Punk rock in Spain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 18:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

United States

Hi there, are you thinking of nominating this article as a Featured article candidate? I certainly think it is good enough and if you haven't done this before it is an interesting experience. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Most of the size is references, the readable text is about 75 kb, which should be acceptable. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Unites States is not the sole superpower

I disagree with your undo under the United States article, the US can't be a sole superpower. I have read articles from the last 5 months how Russia has become a superpower again, so I disagree with calling the US a sole superpower as this is not the truth. Just to make things a little clear on my end, I found these sources on Russia.

A Superpower Is Reborn : The New York Times : By RONALD STEEL : August 24, 2008 : http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/opinion/24steel.html

Superpower swoop : By Misha Glenny : New Statesman : August 14 2008 : http://www.newstatesman.com/europe/2008/08/georgia-russia-ukraine-cheney

US worries Russia returning to authoritarian past : By the Associated Press : August 15, 2008 : http://wokv.com/common/ap/2008/08/17/D92K3M7O0.html

Russians are confident their nation is back as a Superpower New York Times : By Anne Barnard : August 15, 2008 : http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2008/08/15/russians_are_confident_their_nation_is_back/

I will change the content back to superpower or maybe great power as the US is in a financial melt down as you have not discussed your undo under the discussions page, you have not provided any new facts but old articles from the 1990's.

--Benhound (talk) 06:50, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

United States - Popular media: paragraph needs refs

I placed the {{fact}} tags because of the small editwar (of which you were a part) over the inclusion of Cher in the last sentence. What about Frank Sinatra? I guess the "detailed information" that might need support is the inclusion of specific artists as illustrative of the U.S.'s world influence. --Evb-wiki (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Fweeeee! Edit war!

Look, there really was consensus to remove it. Fabricating your own, solo consensus to override that and conduct an edit war does nobody any favors. I don't care though; you want to edit war ad infinitum, be my guest. I don't care about the article. Enjoy! --Hammersoft (talk) 22:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Punk rock. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ~ L'Aquatique[talk] 00:19, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2