User talk:Doc1st
December 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Henry M. Morris. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. P Carn (talk) 22:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Henry M. Morris. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize add biased content to pages, as you did with this edit to Henry M. Morris. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thatguyflint Talk to me! 23:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, Doc1st. By stating that the comment by Henry Morris is unbiased, you have inserted biased comment. As suggested elsewhere, perhaps the talk page for the article might be a good place to discuss inserting the quote. I hope the removal has not dampened your interest in contributing constructively. Thanks, and happy editing. Thatguyflint
Talk to me!23:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- I have delved a little deeper, and agree with you on one point: the section you reference does indeed focus primarily on criticisms of the subjects views, rather than the subjects views themselves. In fact, as pointed out earlier on the talk thread, under the heading "Neutrality of Article", the article itself appears to violate Wikipedia policy (specifically Neutral Point of View). However, as stated by myself and P Carn, the place to discuss this is on the article's talk page and not within the article itself. You have appeared to violate Wikipedia's rule against reverting more than 3 times in a 24 hour period and are dangerously close to being blocked. I personally believe that would be a shame, since you seem to be trying to be constructive. Please review our policies, so that this does not happen. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia! Thatguyflint
Talk to me!23:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- I have delved a little deeper, and agree with you on one point: the section you reference does indeed focus primarily on criticisms of the subjects views, rather than the subjects views themselves. In fact, as pointed out earlier on the talk thread, under the heading "Neutrality of Article", the article itself appears to violate Wikipedia policy (specifically Neutral Point of View). However, as stated by myself and P Carn, the place to discuss this is on the article's talk page and not within the article itself. You have appeared to violate Wikipedia's rule against reverting more than 3 times in a 24 hour period and are dangerously close to being blocked. I personally believe that would be a shame, since you seem to be trying to be constructive. Please review our policies, so that this does not happen. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia! Thatguyflint
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please sign all of your posts, including those to others' talk pages with ~~~~. P Carn (talk) 23:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Henry M. Morris. Catgut (talk) 23:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Henry M. Morris. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Momo san Gespräch 23:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Please stop editing Henry M. Morris. Just do. Period. Materialscientist (talk) 23:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
May I strongly suggest to discuss your proposed changes at the talk page of the corresponding article, and not introduce them until a consensus is reached. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)