User talk:Do.rudi

Welcome!

Hello, Do.rudi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Donika rudi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 02:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Donika rudi

The article Donika rudi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 02:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit.

Donika, I undid your edit because such edit may be considered vandalism in Wikipedia. I have worked a little on your article (see this), and as an experienced wikipedian I believe the article will stay and prosper. However the tag that user:Kedadi placed, just calls for more references, it's nothing against the article. It's just that the name of the creator and the name of the article seem to be the same. However, if you are unsure how to reference, please take a look at my talk page to see the references helpdesk, or drop a line to me so that I can help. Again welcome to Wikipedia. --_Sulmues^{Let's talk} 17:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donika Rudi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donika Rudi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donika Rudi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]