User talk:Dnugroho97

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dnugroho97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting that my block be unblocked because I have understood the mistake I made and am committed to correcting my behavior. I recognize that I violated block evasion, and I have taken steps to ensure that this does not happen again. I have read and understand Wikipedia's guidelines in more depth, and I am committed to complying with all policies and guidelines in the future. I am also ready to contribute positively by adding accurate and useful information to the Wikipedia community. Please consider my request to be unblocked so that I can return to contributing in an appropriate and constructive manner.

Decline reason:

As you no longer plan to evade the block on your original account, there is no reason to lift the block on this abusive sockpuppet account. Yamla (talk) 11:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dnugroho97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request that my blocked account be reactivated. With a blocked account, I feel that my right to contribute better and be active on Wikipedia is limited. I am committed to following the guidelines and making positive contributions.

Decline reason:

Yep, the whole point of the block is to keep you from contributing. You have no "right" to contribute to this privately operated project. Until you are willing to abide by the block(which was made in accordance with the guidelines you claim you are committed to following) we can do nothing for you. Should you choose to abide by it, in six months time without editing under any account or IP address you will need to return to your original account and request unblock there. We don't unblock sock accounts, as you were told above. At that time you will need to tell us why you have chosen to disregard policies and the instructions you've been given. This isn't a guarantee that you will be unblocked, especially with your history of evasion, but it's your only legitimate path forward. If you aren't willing to do that, we're all just wasting our time. 331dot (talk) 12:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.