User talk:Dmhaglund

G'day

I started a draft at IOs, just give a look Daoken 15:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your mssg

Nice to hear from you, thanks for the reply. Haglund seems a Swedish name, myself I am Bergstrom (also Swedish family -heja heja - ) I am a kiwi (NZ) commissioned in Malaysia and region, let me know if I can be of help, here are some good links:

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some pages that will help you to find your way around, understand some of the most relevant policies and guidelines, and develop your editing skills:
Basics Glossary of Wikipedia terminology The five pillars of Wikipedia Contributing to Wikipedia How to edit a page Learn from others Wikipedia Tutorial Q&A Frequently Asked Questions Why was my page deleted? Where to ask a question Department directory Copyright FAQ Editor's Index Village pump	Community Administrators' noticeboard How to use talk pages Resolving disputes Community Portal Maintenance WikiProjects Civility Articles Cite your sources with footnotes How to develop an article Starting a new page Naming conventions Using categories Manual of Style	Policies and Guidelines Notability and Verifiability "Ownership" of articles What Wikipedia is not User page guidelines Neutral Point of View No original research Copyright violations Deletion policy External links Images Uploading images Image use policy Copyright tags Upload wizard
A few other useful tips: Please sign your name when you comment on talk pages (not articles) by using four tildes (~~~~), which will show your name and the date. When you edit a page, even minor edits, you should include a descriptive edit summary. If you need help, Drop by the Help Desk or the New Contributors' Help page. Another option is to join the adopt-a-user project. You can also add {{helpme}} to your talk page, followed by your question, or ask me on my talk page and I can try to help, or point you to someone who can. Happy Editing!- Daoken 10:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC) OSCE Hi. The OSCE never acquired legal status of IGO because never created a charter, treaty or convention ratified and signed by member countries. However it is an IO in own right because of scope, membership and presence, all three attributes that define an IO. So it is an IO but not a formal IGO. Legally, in case of a legal proces, it will be considered an ad hoc commission which started as a conference and ended up as an organization. It will draw its legal status from the IGO under which it was created if there is a document establishing that creation for a purpose. So, legally is an ad hoc commission of international scope, in practice is an International Organization, structurally and if challenged in a court, will need to prove first that was created by the UN and then will be treated as a part of it. It can be listed between the IOs but not under IGOs. The IOs page should have a box detailing all IGOs and all IOs acting as IGOs in full right amd the OSCE should be there. I also looked at the OSCE page and can do with more solidity, if you want I give a look on it. To anyone asking the OSCE is an IO. Have a nice trip and carry me some virtual chocolate Daoken 14:33, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Afterthought: That is independent of the legal status or recognition it may have acquired individually in each country, I was talking under international law, however in a tribunal case in an specific country, it will draw its legal persona from its local legal status and recognition (i.e. if registered there or in some way officially recognized by a document, or the host country has signed its approval for its presence there Daoken 14:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Invitation I invite you to give a look in this WikiProject that may be interests you. WikiProject Timeline Tracer has been greatly enhanced with Guidelines and Strategy as well as many alternatives which will make your editions more easy to target, easier to tag or comment and much more. Please go to WP:TIMETRACE, give a look in the new tools and get busy helping articles. Remember that this WikiProject is helping the backbone (beyond content) of all articles , Reliable Sources and Verification. Thank you for giving a look, if you participate you will be very welcome, if you decide to not we thank you for your visit Daoken 11:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)