User talk:Djodjor

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to White Lady have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: White Lady was changed by Djodjor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863941 on 2022-01-18T09:05:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pukni Zoro moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pukni Zoro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should stop vandalising wikipedia. Djodjor (talk) 20:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The whole section states the autochthonous Albanian theory as fact even though it's heavy speculation. Djodjor (talk) 20:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Spicy (talk) 23:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pukni Zoro

Hello, Djodjor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pukni Zoro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pukni Zoro

Hello, Djodjor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pukni Zoro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kosovo–Macedonian border shootout (April 2010) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kosovo–Macedonian border shootout (April 2010) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo–Macedonian border shootout (April 2010) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Banjska attack

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iaof2017 (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]