User talk:Diz syd 63

Welcome!

Hello, Diz syd 63, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Powers ^T 13:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St. Andrew's

Hi Diz syd!

I notice that you have started editting wikipedia only very recently. With regards to your edits to the St. Andrew's Cathedral page- the organ, the first rule of any editor is to read the paragraph that you are editting before you change it in order that you do not break the flow of coherent information.

While your contributions regarding the ongoing organ recitals are valuable, the informmation has been placed in such a way that it interrupts a paragraph concerned exclusively with the structure of the organ. Your sentence now makes nonsense of the sentence which now follows it. I could fix the problem easily, but as an exercise in good editting, it would be preferable if you were to go back, look at the problem and turn your sentence regarding recitals into a seperate paragraph. --Amandajm 03:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pitman Shorthand - Complete Theory

What is this? It's not an encyclopedia article... —Centrx→talk • 05:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very true - so what part of wikipedia do I save it too?

If you are writing this yourself, newly, Wikibooks would be the place, I think. Check out the policies there first though. —Centrx→talk • 05:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is also Wikisource, but that does not allow original contributions. —Centrx→talk • 05:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:01-pee.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:01-pee.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 16:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use the edit summary box

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. None of your edits contain summaries. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:TLP DJT.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TLP DJT.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anacrusis.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anacrusis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mosaic notation program for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mosaic notation program is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosaic notation program (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk _YO! 06:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]