User talk:Dixon324

Speedy deletion of Alex Dixon

A tag has been placed on Alex Dixon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. mboverload @ 02:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Dixon and Willie Dixon

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created, as you did at Alex Dixon. This can be considered vandalism. I have not readded the speedy deletion template, as I feel there is an assertion of notability, but I did tag the article for possible notability issues and a lack of sources. It is possible that the article will be nomiated for deletion unless information is added to it. Also, please don't add unsourced information about Alex Dixon to the Willie Dixon article. Your edits should be verifiable per WP:V. Please let me know if you have any questions. Movingboxes (talk) 03:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize what I had done was considered vandalism and will make sure to not do so again in the future. I have cited reference points now. Please check for accuracy and let me know if everything is ok.Dixon324 (talk) 03:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While you've cited sources now, the sources fall short of the expectations for reliable sources set forth at WP:RS. In order for a subject to meet the guidelines at WP:MUSIC there should be non-trivial, third-party coverage, something that doesn't seem to exist for this subject. Movingboxes (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now cited new references. Do they now satisfy the requirements? Thanks!Dixon324 (talk) 04:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alex Dixon

I have nominated Alex Dixon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Dixon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 03:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is my first attempt at posting information and apologize that I must have done something in error. I have gone in and cited reference points and added information on why this person is notable. Please let me know if I need to add something else. Thanks.Dixon324 (talk) 03:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now cited new references. Do they now satisfy the requirements? Thanks!Dixon324 (talk) 04:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Alex Dixon.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Alex Dixon.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Schuym1 (talk) 03:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image now has the proper copyright tag. Thanks!Dixon324 (talk) 04:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Dixon

A tag has been placed on Alex Dixon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 22:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Alex Dixon

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Alex Dixon, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.answers.com/topic/alex-dixon. As a copyright violation, Alex Dixon appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Alex Dixon has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Alex Dixon and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Alex Dixon with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Alex Dixon.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Alex Dixon, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alex Dixon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alex Dixon. Thanks! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Dixon (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More WP:RS covering the subject in depth are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex Dixon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 05:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dixon324, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades^Godric 05:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alex Dixon concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alex Dixon, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alex Dixon

Hello, Dixon324. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alex Dixon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Alex Dixon.jpg

The file File:Alex Dixon.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Dixon. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]