User talk:Divyanarayan

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lakshmi Narayan Sharma, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lakshmi Narayan Sharma was changed by Divyanarayan (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-07T13:43:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Bhagat Singh appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --Hnsampat (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Hnsampat, you may think that you have a "neutral" point of view on Indian history, but clearly you don't if you think that narrating facts that may make you uncomfortable define neutrality. These websites and public forums are a great way to share information, but it is also sad that people cannot always keep their biases at home. If you want to have a selective take on Indian history that's a problem that I cannot help you with!

I'm not injecting my own biases. On the contrary, I'm asking you not to inject your biases. The edit that you made (which I have undone) injects your own commentary into the article. In particular, the critique you write of the book may be valid, but you don't cite any source and so I have to presume that you're injecting your own viewpoint, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Thanks for understanding! --Hnsampat (talk) 20:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)