User talk:Divius

Speedy deletion of Arkadia Plastics

A tag has been placed on Arkadia Plastics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Newsaholic (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your page

Hey, The article you created did not satisfy the notability guidelines laid out here. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 17:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can I get the page back that I created.

My sources are: http://www.arkadiaplastics.com/

http://www.ptonline.com/dp/showpt/show_index.cfm?code=ARKADIA&lcode=TL

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?dept_id=572386&newsid=19873455

I moved the deleted text to User:Divius/Arkadia Plastics Good luck with the article! Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 21:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you really want to do that, you can click on the "move" tab on the top of the page and follow the instructions. But I have to warn you, if you just put the article back into the wiki without making some changes to it, it will almost definitely get tagged and deleted again. Just so you know. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 15:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arkadia Plastics

A tag has been placed on Arkadia Plastics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Arkadia Plastics and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Alexf^(talk) 23:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Christianity. Thank you. For a controversial edit like this one, you should be providing some sort of reason for your changes.
-Garrett W. (Talk / Contribs / PM) 17:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. You need to make your case on the talk page. Reverting every day while not in technical breech of 3RR as they are not within 24 hours, is still edit warring. --Snowded ^TALK 06:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]