User talk:DivisionalB
Appearance
This is DivisionalB's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 22)
[edit] Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DivisionalB/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! DivisionalB,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
|
Moredecai
[edit]I was wondering why you made this edit to the userpage for Moredecai. Are you related to that account? Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- You also made this edit to Fixer88. It's enough to where you appear to be the same user trying to return in a new account. Per sockpuppetry guidelines this is not permitted and all attempts to rejoin Wikipedia need to be done via the main account. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:01, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC) |
Is it also as well to confuse a person 1st as a vandal and then say he has frauded WP by Role Account preferentially when I verify myself as a contributing identity and not acknowledging sock puppetry? It is warranting my discipline and not your program bot approval. --DivisionalB (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)