User talk:Ditto51/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Ultraseven DVD Release

I suggest you go onto Amazon.com and see the actual Ultraseven DVD release there for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.65.117 (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Rather than being snarky about it, I suggest you follow policy and add the source with the infomation. Also to source statements in the most basic of ways because using other templates can be confusing, so this is just a basic over view but use <ref>[webaddress] retrieved on (date in which you placed it on the page)</ref> In the case of what you are trying to source, the web address should be the item's page on Amazon, and not just www.amazon.com as no one really wants to search through amazon to confirm something. WP:Source and remember, sources are important to Wikipedia.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 20:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Yeah you do know that's a lot to do to get one simple link up onto an article right?! You have to type in this, that and the other, the web address, then this that and the other again, then you have to confirm it, it's a lot of work just to do one simple thing!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.65.117 (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes it is a lot to do just to get a link into the page, but it has to be done due to the rules of wikipedia. Otherwise people could add any old s*&t to the site. Plus since people from various Universities may come on here to do essays on stuff they need links to reliable sources in order for them to cite it within their work.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 20:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

User:88.105.65.117 please don't remove conversations on other peoples talk pages. I like to keep everything on mine anyways--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 21:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome in regards to the article link. Sorry I don't know how to make stuff appear as little notifications, so I've decided to do that here.D31 (talk) 20:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Pitbull page

Hello, I am confused about why my edits keep getting removed from the pitbull page. The page is currently omits all positive information regarding the breed (rehabilitation, temperament testing etc.) however, when I add this, it gets removed. Why is my information being removed as "unconstructive editing" when it is cited and correct?

Thanks! Usainboltfan (talk) 19:22, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Section headings should not have every word captilised unless they are proper nouns, and see this edit reversion for the reasons why your edits are being reverted [1].--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi again,

Would you be able to provide an explanation for why the cited information that I added to the page was flagged as "Restore to pre POV vandalism version. Don't whitewash articles by removing negative information. (TW))"? I don't understand why positive facts cannot be included in this page - likewise this edit was an addition in which I included a reference (which keeps getting deleted) to the temperament test data. Is this a mistake or does Wikipedia prohibit selective facts from being displayed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usainboltfan (talk • contribs) 20:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Usainboltfan, You'll need to talk to the user who reverted your original edits, ie BullRangifer as all I did was revert your capitalization of sub-headings that should not be capitalized and changed a sentence back to the way in which it actually makes it more clear for a reader to understand.

Also on a seperate note you can sign your posts using ~~~~. Please remember this as it makes it easier for other users to see who they are dealing with before the autosign bot gets to page.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 21:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Actually now that I look at my edit I realise I undid more than I thought, sorry about that. I have reinserted the paragraph you added (but not the changes to the heading or setence for reasons stated above) but you'll have to talk to BullRangifer at his talk page to find out why he reverted it in the first place.

Again, sorry for the miss understanding. My bad--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 21:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Gaza Freedom Flotilla

Hi,

I'm confused as to why you removed my edit on the article for being "unconstructive." The purpose was to show what the members of the flotilla were doing that was different from normal circumstances (basically: what made the event unique), which is obviously relevant information to the topic. I'm adding it back in for now and look forward to discussing this with you in the future. 24.215.169.213 (talk) 00:12, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Re: Once Upon a Time

Hello. I received your message on my talk and I shall keep what you said in mind. The reason I failed to double checked the page's history is that I've been under a lot of pressure lately, what with the Summer heat and a user accusing me for accusing him for being a beginner during a discussion on Superbook. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:15, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Stupid editors

Please see this section called "Blocked"[2], regards. --The 5th Doctor (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry What?--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 18:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

You have been active at the article or talk page, so here's a note about Anarcho-capitalism

I have nominated Anarcho-capitalism for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Binksternet (talk) 18:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Continuum Broadcast

Hello Ditto51,

I see you have reverted my edit removing the Canadian French broadcast details from the Continuum (TV series) article. After considering your explanation I would have to agree that there is no reason why it shouldn't be included (prior to my edit I looked at the French version of the article and saw addikTV was mentioned and didn't think it needed to be included in both the French and English articles). My only problem is that not only am I not Canadian, but I also don't speak French, so am unable to find any articles related to the shows broadcast on addik. Do you have any sources, or first hand knowledge, as to which seasons (if not all) of Continuum air on addik? As Wikipedia requires everything to be referenced I would need some help to expand on addik's broadcasting of the series.

Thanks,

Forbesy 777 (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for all of the fine work on the Halo MCC and Marvel Cinematic Universe pages!

Tylercpetersen (talk) 02:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Smash the Mirror and Once Upon a Time

"Well stop putting the wrong titles, you should check Adam Horowitz Twitter very well, he has the titles spoiled pics scripts and is clearly Episode 9 is Fall is Ep 10 is Shattered Glass, Ep 11 is Heroes & villains....I don't know who's is your source the titles are all wrong from ep 9 and forward!!! Also ep 12 is Darkness on the edge of town is not Ep13 Adam has just tweeted me clarifying the titles" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchellponce (talk • contribs) 22:15, 17 November 2014‎ (GMT)

Stop changing something if it's not right! Or you just blind? See that ABC OFFICIAL PAGE and stop changing number of the episodes! Next time you do that I also report you to administrator, because I'm right!!!

Sedflash 06:55, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

@Sedflash: Have you even looked at the article's talk page? I think you probably should.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 08:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 17 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Once Upon a Time (season 4) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Continuum (season 4)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Continuum (season 4), Ditto51!

Wikipedia editor StewdioMACK just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

If you can, try and add some categories.

To reply, leave a comment on StewdioMACK's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by StewdioMACK (talk • contribs) 12:51, 9 December 2014‎

Thanks, I forgot to unhide the categories after I moved it from my userspace..--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 11:44, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films

I don't see how that diff is a reliable source that proves the statement. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

"Marvel's involvement will hopefully deliver the creative continuity and authenticity that fans demand from the MCU"--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 21:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Still, a random user's statement is not reliable. Weegeerunner (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

It came from the source I provided in my edit desciption which in turn came from the Marvel website and Feige mouth.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 22:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

That source was a user's statement, that user is not reliable. We should cite the website and any other reliable sources that state Feige said that. Not someone stating that in a WP talk page. Weegeerunner (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

The current cited sources on the page are the kind of ones we should be citing. But I think we have enough reliable sources for those statements now. Weegeerunner (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

how is is it unreliable? It has been confirmed by marvel. timefortimeforce (talk)

Zzaxx1

Just letting do not worry about reverting him, I'm about to report him.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 20:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Merlyn/The Dark Archer

Hey, I thought you may like to voice your opinon on a matter that is currently being debated over at the DC comic book character Merlyn's Talk page. Thank you and cheers, LLArrow (talk) 05:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Hebron14

Why did you revert my "List of The Flash epidodes" page for?Hebron14 (talk) 23:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Because it is way too early for the page. Wait until season 2 episodes are announced.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 08:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Once Upon a Time

Sorry for adding Canada on Once Upon a Time (TV series). I wasn't myself when that happened. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 11:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Manual of Style: Dates and numbers: Dates and years

Re: edits in Avengers: Age of Ultron surrounding use of commas in dates

Manual of Style: Date formats

Manual of Style: Commas

Consciouslee (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Better Source?

In reference to your reversion of my edit at The Flash (2014 TV series). Who decides what sources are acceptable and which ones are not? I have found multiple sources that attended Wondercon and have cited the SAME information as other sources. If the source I cited isn't acceptable then how am I to know if any of the other sources, with the SAME info, will be acceptable or if I'm just going to get reverted again.Pjstar35 (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2)

First of all, you say "Changes are fine", then why revert them? I guess you meant the previous changes were fine -- but that was a reversion of my edit (but at least you gave some explanation). "the link should go directly to them." Not true. The first name given is what should be linked. It doesn't matter if it's a redirect. If the first one isn't the main one, then they should be switched around. But, if those were your issues, then you should have just changed them instead of a complete reversion. I never (or rarely) make a total reversion of an edit by an editor who has the same amount of experience, or especially if they have considerably more. Please find out whose edits you're reverting before making that decision. --Musdan77 (talk) 16:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

I reverted full because your edits were all over the page and it was quicker to just revert the whole thing. The only thing that was not quite nessisary for me to revert was the links in the award section. Which I then went back and changed into one cell. Everything else in your edit I disagreed with.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 17:07, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Let me further advise you from my experience. It is often better to inquire of the more experienced editor on their talk page (or on the article talk page) and discussing the matter before making a disruptive edit -- which is what a reversion like that can be considered. If you don't have a link to an MOS to back up your reversion and it's only your opinion or preference then it is not a good idea to completely revert a veteran editor's edit. Thanks. --Musdan77 (talk) 18:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

How was it disruptive? I'm sorry if you felt offended by me reverting your edit, but I simply reverted the article back to the version that I felt was better and was also similar to the season 1 page. You were WP:BOLD in changing the established layout of the article and were reverted, so by WP:BRD, if you still feel your edit was better for the page then you should be the one taking it to the talk page. And just because you have a few more years doesn't mean that your opinion automatically trumps mine, as such I have every right to Revert your edit.

And just so you know, If I had agreed with most of your edit and only disliked a small portion, then I would have gone back through the page and undone that bit specifically.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 14:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Arrow/Flash spin-off

Ok I added the sourceThe Ouroboros, the Undying, the Immortal (talk) 06:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

"S.O.S.", Parts 1 and 2

I split the two-hour season finale "S.O.S." into two parts. Please don't try to fuse them back together into one. Please talk about this on the "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2)" talk page. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:00, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

You talk about it. You are the only one who is trying to fight the fusing of them, everyone else wants them fused.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 14:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Once Upon a Time & Disney

Should we change the links in the other three seasons and the main article? I understand your reason for doing it, but I am confused about a few things. While the series in inspired by a lot of the Disney films, there are some differences. Robin Hood, his Merry Men, Maid Marian, and the Sheriff of Notingham are not animals like in the 1973 film. The Once Upon a Time version of Mulan is also different from the animated version due to her having romantic feelings for Aurora. The consensus for the Mulan (Disney character) article was not to categorize her as an LGBT character since the animated character was heterosexual. And finally Peter Pan was a villain with no chance of redemption at all. Should we just link them all to List of Once Upon a Time characters What do you think? Sb1990 (talk) 21:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

I think the ones like Belle, Cinderella, Snow, Regina and Auroua should link to the disney articles, because when it comes down to it, that is where most of their backstory (and names) are taken from. Plus it is more direct than linking to the fairytale. So if the character has their own page then it should link there. Mulan was done through consesus so their is no reason to try to change that. Pan is a lot closer to the original fairytale, but at the same time was twisted by Once (by being Rumple's father). It will probably be easier to just link them all to the LoC page, that is more direct and explains the character that is being linked to. You might want to bring it up on the main page talk page first though, just to get some more opinions on it.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 22:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

DC Universe Article

Where would you like me to state why I think it should be kept?--Warner REBORN (talk) 19:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

On the talk page of the article (I've already set up a section where I voiced some of my other concerns) The template should stay there for a few days, just to give some of the other editors a chance to voice their opinions on the matter--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:38, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Arrowverse actors

Please tell me how Gustin and Amell talking about what the characters they play, the LEAD characters at that, will be doing next season is an insufficient source, but being told Tom Cavanagh is back without actually saying he'll be playing Wells and/or Thawne is? There's no logic to it; for example, let's say we went back to 2009/2010 with Doctor Who, and Stephen Moffat said "Karen Gillan will be playing a main character" but didn't give a character name. Gillan had already played a character in an earlier season, a soothsayer, so the natural assumption would be that she'd reprise the same role. Of course, she ended up playing Amy Pond, a completely different character who had nothing to do with her previous character. It wasn't the first time an actor on that show had played one character and ended up playing another, and it wouldn't be the last time either. For all we know, Cavanagh could end up playing a clone of Wells, or perhaps a descendant. Either way, however, assuming Wells or Thawne will be back based solely on "Tom Cavanagh will be back" qualifies as OR, and arguably has less going for it as evidence than my own sources. -- 136.181.195.25 (talk) 19:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

I tried to do some coding difference to make Eobard and Wells there own separate rows but it didn't work (see my test edit). And Doctor Who is an entirely different thing. For 1. the character Gillian portrayed back in the Pompeii episode wasn't even a main character (or even one that people would remember really) so there wouldn't be any confusion, it would almost defiantly be a new character. Whereas with The Flash, Wells was a main character for the first season, if they cast the actor as someone else then that would confuse most people, especially if there was no explanation. A Clone of Wells would still be Wells and it is extremely unlikely that Wells would have a decedent (since he and his wife died when Eobard killed them).

And like I said at the start, I tried to do something with the codding of the table to put Eobard and Wells on separate rows but it didn't work. Consider taking it up on the article talk page to see what other editors think. I think it should stay for now and then be removed should he indeed (however unlikely) be portraying a different character.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Then let's use a show in the same universe as an example: Celina Jade as Shado in the first two seasons of Arrow, then her twin sister Mei in the third. Who's to say that Wells doesn't have a twin brother, or an illegitimate child who comes back from the future like Thawne? And a clone wouldn't necessarily be the same character, with fellow DC characters Superman and Superboy. Or perhaps an alternate universe version of Wells similar to the relationship between Supergirl and Power Girl; Gustin did talk about how Season 2 would feature different timelines. There's plenty of ways to have Cavanagh return as someone completely different, and just assuming he's Wells would once again be WP:OR. Either way, I have started a discussion on the talk page that should hopefully settle this concretely. -- 136.181.195.25 (talk) 19:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Lets be honest here, Shado was dead, there was no time travel, there was no erasing the person who killed her from exsistance. (By the way, even if Wells does come back it is almost defintly going to be a different character). I digress to the Supergirl one. Superman and Superboy look completely different from each other, if they were going down that route then it would be a different actor altogether. Also without some servre gentic manipulation, his son would never look exactly like him to be portrayed by the same actor. (Also that would confuse people even more).--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2

James Gunn confirmed on Facebook that this is the official title of the film. It doesn't sound sarcastic like in his tweet. Variety also confirms this as well. Richiekim (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films

Thank you for removing my edit on the List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films just to redo it yourself moments later.Shabook (talk) 16:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

quite a while later actually, and it is because a valid source came up that was actual confirmation --Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 16:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Arrow The Flash

Ditto51, I'm not going to re-revert your reversion of my edit, but indicating what seasons main cast appear (when they don't appear throughout a TV show's entire run) is pretty standard at TV series articles on Wiki, so I suggest that "(season 1)" be put back in for Rick Cosnett at Arrow... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

@IJBall: We don't do it on the Arrow page, and surely the note saying: "He kills himself in the first season finale in order to wipe Eobard Thawne, his distant descendant, from history.[12]" is self explanatory enough for most people to see that he isn't a series regular anymore. I'll tweak the sentence a bit as a compromise: How about "Cosnett left the series after the first season following his character's suicide to wipe Eobard Thawne, his distant descendant, from history.[12]". What do you think?--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Heh – Arrow, Flash... Oops! Anyway, I'm not trying to cause any trouble, so you can do what the consensus is at that article. I'm just pointing out that lots of TV articles on Wiki do do a "Rick Cosnett as Eddie Thawne (season 1):" kind of thing in their cast lists for anybody who isn't in the cast throughout the show's run but just in selected seasons. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

I would prefer it within the sentence about his death, just to keep it in line with the other cast members, ie no extra bracket. It gets the information across with context.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:46, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Zach Appelman

Hi there. I was wondering if you think that the notability could be taken down since there is now 8 references. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 02:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Agents of Shield

What about my editing was disruptive? I read over the Wiki page and found nothing that I did to be disruptive in any way.

I am new to wiki editing, but nothing I've read on Wiki rules says there is a problem with my edit. I started editing to help out the moderators at airdates. They index the info from the wiki to give air dates for all upcoming TV shows. A lot have asked for this to be added and it cannot be until the dates have been added here. The only disruption I see is you removing my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonny462 (talk • contribs) 07:45, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

You need to provide a reliable souece to go with the dates, just saying you work somewhere is not a valid source. Also you have been reverted by at least 2 editors and you are now edit warring over the content. So please stop --Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 09:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Consensus discussion on Agents of SHIELD (Season 2)

Hi. I've begun a consensus discussion on the matter of the Season 2 finale synopsis, and invited 10 other editors who have participated on that talk page to offer their opinions. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 04:48, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

The Flash

Unfortunately, the IP editor's edits were far from good faith - they've now gotten up to five reverts (six, if you include the initial edit) and their discussions on my talk page are loaded with sarcasm. I'd report them to WP:AN3, but I realized that I accidentally went over the limit by one. Alex|The|Whovian 11:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll have a look at reporting him when I get home, too tricky with diffs when your on a phone. Anyone who looks at the history may end up blocking you as well though, especially if the IP states that you broke the 3RR as well. Hopefully by the time I get to my third revert, other editors will be on and can continue until he is blocked.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 11:45, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

And I'm at my limit...--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 11:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

And the other editor is at eight. I'm think I ought to go ahead and report, and accept my fate as I will. Alex|The|Whovian 11:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I should be home in three hours, if you want to wait, or see if Bignole will report him, it should keep the fire off you.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 12:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Did it myself. Alex|The|Whovian 12:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your behaviour is not what Jimbo had in mind when he conceived the Wikipedia idea. Here you are, openly admitting that you are "on the phone", suggesting that one editor, after "reaching his revert limit" decided to call his editor buddy via phone to assist him in reverted a valid and highly logical edit of an IP editor. I'm eager to read your rationale on the admin's board on why you think you have the right to remove the Episode headline from the table of content, and what Wikipedia policy and guideline you will provide to support your rationale. Thank you and have a nice day. 93.135.14.96 (talk) 12:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I'd already reverted you before seeing his message.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 12:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry to be that guy, but...

Correct spelling for Excalibur. Just an fyi, not meant to show you up, just edjucate. Totally fine if you delete this comment as soon as you read it. Thanks for all the great work you do :D! LLArrow (talk) 19:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I guess. It was an edit summary done with Twinkle so I couldn't click onto another tab to check :), anyway that may help if I end up needing to use it in the articles, as it is now on my talk page spelt correctly so I don't need to spend ages trying to figure out how to spell it to get the right autocorrect.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Life Is Peer Reviewed

First of all, I am immensely grateful for the work you've done on the LIS article. I'm soon going to nominate it for GA review, but first I would like your suggestions on how to improve it. Here's the link to the archive. Cognissonance (talk) 10:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Once Upon a Time (season 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic Mirror. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Soldier or Solider?

Hi, looking at this revert, are you sure you meant Solider? I'm pretty sure that's a typo. ϢereSpielChequers 16:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

I didn't even realise it was a spelling mistake that the script changed. I saw that it changed it to lower case. My bad.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 16:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Hello Ditto51: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, LLArrow (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!

Hello Ditto51, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Happy editing, Alex|The|Whovian 04:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Seasons Greetings!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!

Hello Ditto51, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Happy editing, TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:20, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merger discussion for Family tree of Muhammad

An article that you have been involved in editing—Family tree of Muhammad —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 89.240.87.162 (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ditto51. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject The Vampire Diaries

Template:WikiProject The Vampire Diaries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:29, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ditto51. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ditto51. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)