User talk:DissidentRUS

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, DissidentRUS! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 00:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Muhammad, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Wasbeer 04:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When I was printing that I new what I was doing... But sometimes we must say truth about them, arent we?--DissidentRUS (talk) 04:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Respect comes before freedom... We're all here to contribute to Wikipedia, only. I'm not on any-side tho :). Happy editing ~ AdvertAdam^talk 06:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They respect only force and war. But I shall try to obey further wikicrimes =) --DissidentRUS (talk) 10:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, you should... lol. I actually study and research all religions, and have an estimate (made by non-Muslims) that the total Muslim terrorists are less than 1% of their population. Look at Malaysia and Indonesia, the largest Muslim communities. I hate to defend anybody and anything, but I just like truth. ~ AdvertAdam^talk 10:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
California... In 2006 i spent 2 months there...--DissidentRUS (talk) 10:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hehe, you're welcome back anytime bro ~ AdvertAdam^talk 10:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My dream is to immigrate from Russia. San Diego is really wonderful place. About muslims - about 20 % of Russian population pray Allah, so I studied there religion - read Quran and Buhari book of hadith - I can say these books are full of hate and real muslims are very agressive, espeicially people from arab countries and Nord Caucasians. But tatars and kazahs are much more civilized - some of my friends are tatars.--DissidentRUS (talk) 10:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ya, California is uneiq. When my relatives come around from Washington, they're amazed to see 4 seasons in a 2-hour drive.
- You said so yourself, if Arabs are aggressive, they're 15% of the population: so you also can't call them real Muslims. The only Russians I knew in my life almost got me killed, on purpose; but I can't assume that all Russians are like that, right? Don't make generization, to be fair. Even if a family has two serious murderers, we say that the whole family are murderers (which is wrong). Another point, that any texture can be manipulated to show the opposite, so it doesn't mean that what you read is what it really means. Actually even Arab Christians and Jews pray to Allah, as it's just an Arabic word for God. Take care, I gotta get some sleep :) ~ AdvertAdam^talk 11:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vahtang Mikeladze

The article Vahtang Mikeladze has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Grigori Perelman, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 17:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User_talk:Ymblanter. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ymblanter has asked you not to post on his talk page, and to ignore it with a personal attack such as that you have now posted, is not on and could be regarded as harrassment. He has asked you not to post on his talk page, so respect that, otherwise I will ask for admin intervention myself. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 17:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have personal interest in conflict? Do youspeak Russian? Blanter told you to come here?--DissidentRUS (talk) 17:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I will no more post him. But i am 1 man. Not "they"--DissidentRUS (talk) 17:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors and not complain about them editing like you did on User talk:Russavia. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Breawycker (talk to me!) 17:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vladimir Muhankin

The article Vladimir Muhankin has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Prestonmag (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DissidentRUS

Hello DissidentRUS. I noticed you, or another editor created a Requests for Adminship page under your name, and I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. Please note that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets an extremely high bar for potential administrator candidates. That being said, I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship, Wikipedia:Adminship is not for new users, and Wikipedia:Not now, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you are certain that you want to go through with the request, you will need to transclude your RfA at WP:RFA by following the instructions at WP:RFA/N. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

so I will do it--DissidentRUS (talk) 18:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to sound harsh, but just so you know, this RFA is 100% going to fail, you simply don't have enough experience. To pass an RFA you need thousands of edits and months of experience, I strongly advise you to withdraw now--Jac16888 ^Talk 18:52, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, you don't sound harsh. And let me think that it is going to fail not 100, but just 99.9 % ;-)--DissidentRUS (talk) 18:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me, its 100%. The fact that you failed to even create it properly [1], and have less than 100 edits makes it guaranteed to fail--Jac16888 ^Talk 18:58, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I may stick my oar in as well, anyone voting may well take your admission of racism badly. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it against rules? If yes, feel free to demolish those words.--DissidentRUS (talk) 19:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*FUCK OFF! My zajavka has been sunk by the enemy ;-( Maybe on Russian Presidental elections of 2018 I will be more sucessful? Hmm... But it is going to be a problem to collect 2 millions of signatures to take part...--DissidentRUS (talk) 19:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if its against the rules, and I have no right to tell you what you can or cannot do, but as far as running for adminship goes, it is very likely that an admission like that could damage any future admin attempts you make. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to test Wiki on freedom of speech and write several racisms on my userpage)))--DissidentRUS (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you do that, I will block you, as I'm close to doing already--Jac16888 ^Talk 19:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know, that you are a bit repressive? --DissidentRUS (talk) 19:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vladimir Muhankin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladimir Muhankin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Muhankin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

#

DissidentRUS# Not the first and not the last time, not the best and not the worst crime...--DissidentRUS (talk) 19:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darya Donczova

The article Darya Donczova has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:32, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vahtang Mikeladze

The article Vahtang Mikeladze has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

==You attack my articles just to annoy me. These actions are honestless and miserable==--DissidentRUS (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC) --DissidentRUS (talk) 19:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A PROD is not a definite deletion. It will remain for 7 days and, if no one removes it, the article will be deleted. If you had not engaged in unconstructive editing, then you would be able to bring them up to standards. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So now my articles are hostages... Beautiful. I feel myself in Russian Wikipedia again... There ARE sources in my articles...

SAD.--DissidentRUS (talk) 19:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They need to be notable, third party sources as per WP:NOTABILITY. I would suggest you read up on basic Wikipedia policies until your block runs out. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about blocking myself forever. With or without last "suicide" action :-)DissidentRUS (talk) 20:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What is the point. It will get reverted in no time at all and you will be blocked for a longer amount of time. Why not just chill out whilst your block is in place and then, if you don't want to come back, you will at least be able to should you change your mind --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:08, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All this formal and dirty campaign against my articles is just the punishment for hopeless atempt to become admin) Your rules are just a curtain, informal rules work here.--DissidentRUS (talk) 20:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not the case at all. If you make constructive edits and participate in a constructive manner once your block is up, there is no reason why you cannot try again. And the rules are there, not to punish people for doing things wrong, but to make sure that the site isn't swamped by things that should not be there. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kindness.--DissidentRUS (talk) 20:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, when your block is up, I can give you a hand with your articles. At least then we can give them the best chance possible. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--DissidentRUS (talk) 20:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but if there's any more racism or unconstructive edits, then you may well end up being blocked again. I am more than happy to give you a hand, but you must help me to help you by being on your best behavior. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:32, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I agree.--DissidentRUS (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :). If you could leave me a message on my talk page when your block is up and then we can try and get something sorted :) --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Thank you for your message. Before you start editing, I want to know what pages you would like to edit/create. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 03:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To improve my old articles and then to translate new ones.--DissidentRUS (talk) 03:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but what were your old articles about? I'm just interested to know :) --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 03:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List:
1.All-Russian Academy of Foreign Trade
2. Darya Dontsova
3. Tyko Vylka from which 1 ... wikiPEDIAN removed picture.--DissidentRUS (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

4.Vladimir Muhankin‎;
5.Vahtang Mikeladze‎.

Ok then. Which one of those would you like to start improving first? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1 then 2 then 3 then 4 then 5 then I will right several more.--DissidentRUS (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. I would recommend that we improve the articles you have listed already before you start making new ones. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Routine...--DissidentRUS (talk) 14:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right, what I will do is take a look at the article, work out what needs to be done and then let you know what we can do to improve it. I am, however, a little busy at the moment, so it might take some time. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you--DissidentRUS (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 15:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to be honest with you here. If you vandalize or threaten to vandalize again, I will wash my hands of you. I am not going to waste my time trying to help someone who does not want to be helped. As to your query about the Vladimir Muhankin article, I do not know, the reason being that I have been trying to look for sources for All-Russian Academy of Foreign Trade. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 18:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

O, I am not threatening... I just like break rules. FOr VAVT I have an idea/...

Well, putting things such as I was editing but some bad spirit tells me: Go vandalizing, they will not catch you does not make me believe otherwise. Take some time to think it over and then let me know if you actually want to try and be a constructive member of this community. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 18:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I swear and give an oath to be more constructive, than constructivists themselves!--DissidentRUS (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, DissidentRUS. You have new messages at Reaper Eternal's talk page.
Message added 18:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Page41attack

Is there a reason you created the above account? Please review our policy on alternate accounts. One account per person, please. TN X Man 19:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check user proof?--DissidentRUS (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're asking. I am a checkuser, if that's what you mean, and yes, I know that's your account. TN X Man 19:12, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am always caught like this))) You R good checkuser. Block 4 ever now?--DissidentRUS (talk) 19:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I noticed that you used your alternate account to vandalize Russavias page, despite what I said. It is clear to me now that you never had any intention of stopping your disruptive behaivour. As I said earlier, I am washing my hands of you as you have no real intention of being constructive here. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jac16888 ^Talk 19:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]