User talk:Dispenze

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Iamrhyssmart per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamrhyssmart. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dispenze (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wow, I love being called a sockpuppet, but that aint accurate at all. Where do i upload ID to prove that im not Rhys Smart? Dispenze (talk) 19:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nowhere, since that's a identity theft risk, and it only proves that you possess a copy of an ID. As noted, you will need to address the similarity in edits. 331dot (talk) 19:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then I'm sure you have an interesting explanation for how you both somehow created the exact same article about Rhys Smart. I look forward to hearing it. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Seems highly unlikely that we both created the exact same article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dispenze (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rhys Smart

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rhys Smart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]