User talk:Disneytree

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nancy Temple Rodrigue

Nancy Temple Rodrigue, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 23:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden Mickey's at DCA

Hi, I noticed your recent edit in DCA added details on hidden mickeys. I don't believe the information is encyclopedic as it is currently stated. Can you please clarify the importance and significance of hidden mickeys inside the park? Are these something that were added during the refurb or did they become popular due to a book? Can you please list a source stating the hidden mickeys were added to the park and/or visitation increased at the park due to the publication of a book? Thanks!FirstDrop87 (talk) 00:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the assist, I missed the citation to an article in the O.C. Register pertaining to the addition of Hidden Mickey's, Now it's there as a reference. Disneytree (talk) 23:10, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nancy Temple Rodrigue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nancy Temple Rodrigue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Temple Rodrigue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 21:00, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Disneytree,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]