User talk:Disneyfolly

You have been here a while but I thought I might give you a welcome as you have not received one:

Welcome!

Hello, Disneyfolly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Camaron | Chris (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Disney Renaissance has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 01:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Dumbo, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 18:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Fantasia (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Fantasia 2000. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McDoobAU93 (talk) 22:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dumbo, you will be blocked from editing. McDoobAU93 (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)~~[reply]

I've looked at one of the sources you published, and I'm willing for now to leave the info for the February 2010 release in the article for Dumbo. However, one source does make me wonder about this, because the flyer, ostensibly from Disney, does not mention "Disney Blu-ray" or "Disney DVD" as most other releases have done. Further, Disney's own website does not show any 2010 releases at this time.

As to your edits to the articles for Fantasia and Fantasia 2000, there is nothing in either source that says that Disney has either (a) said Dumbo would be part of their new premium line (the "Diamond Edition") or (b) that the re-release of Dumbo would supersede the release of either Fantasia film. Therefore, those warnings will stay.

I've self-reverted the info for Dumbo and left the source intact for now. If you have any questions or comments, please leave them on the talk pages for the respective films so other editors can get involved. Thanks.

--McDoobAU93 (talk) 22:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

Hello, Disneyfolly. You have new messages at McDoobAU93's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blocked yet again

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Bambifan101 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

 When the hell are you going to get the message and stay off of this site?  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Disneyfolly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not Bambifan101 and my only account is the one under my username: Disneyfolly, I've never committed sock puppetry for any vandalic mean and my only interest is to cooperate with Wikipedia adding verifiable and trustworthy content. I don't know who Bambifan101 is and this blockage had taken me by surprise, please revert it because I had never done anything wrong.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, since all of Bambifan101's various sockpuppets have said more or less the same thing, we have to make our best decision based on the evidence in the editing pattern. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Already unblocked per the below comments.

Request handled by: Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Im going to assume good faith

Based on circumstances such as your writing style, the fact you left an e-mail address and the age of this account, I am going to assume good faith and have therefore unblocked this account. I apologize for the misunderstnading and I hope you'll continue to contribute. Given your choice of subject matter, I would also hope that you could keep an eye out for the real Bambifan101. Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PMDrive1061 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

You bet. WP:LTA/BF101 is a separate notice I'd forked off from the main long-term abuse page which will be a big help in showing you what to look for. It's just that the guy is such a chronic vandal that he has a lot of administrators tilting at windmills. Any questionable edits on Disney-related articles and we bring all guns to bear, sometimes with unintended results. This is the second time I've blocked an innocent user and I'm truly sorry for the mix-up. Blocking you was kind of gnawing at me and I'm glad to have revisited the issue and to have resolved this. I'm extremely thankful for your gracious attitude. PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coming right up. Glad you caught me online. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasure to be of assistance. I feel bad about the block and this is the least I can do to make it up to you. Some of those anons are kind of suspect anyway. You'll still be able to edit the article, but new accounts and anons are locked out for a month. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:53, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Walt Disney Platinum Editions

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Walt Disney Platinum Editions. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walt Disney Platinum Editions. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]