User talk:DisneySalt

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Peparazzi (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

OMG GO AWAY!

GO AWAY DISNEYSALT! I'd like to ask kindly to please upload your logo that you have now on a separate file instead of mine. What you are doing is replacing mine with the same copyrights and licensing, and that's not how it works. You're taking all the credit instead of me, so please upload on a separate file. Would that be okay? --Dude (talk) 15:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That seems very unprofessional. Images must be uploaded to proper names. making multiple images is unnecessary.--DisneySalt (talk) 17:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Being Human.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Being Human.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Being Human.jpg, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 08:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: page moves

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Machete (Philippines GMA TV show). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. And please, remove the article above this talk page, this is not the proper way to user your talk page. -WayKurat (talk) 02:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Peparazzi (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 23:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DisneySalt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wait, what? Why am I blocked? Can someone please run an IP check to prove that I'm not a sockpuppet of that user???

Decline reason:

As noted here asking for Checkuser to prove your innocence is generally not a good strategy for an unblock request. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DisneySalt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Then how else can you prove that I AM NOT A SOCKPUPPET.

Decline reason:

That is up to you. You need to convince administrators that you are not. The contributions are similar enough for this block to be plausible. Sandstein 18:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.