Jump to content

User talk:Diskriminierung

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Diskriminierung, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Agathoclea (talk) 22:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Germany

[edit]

Welcome, Diskriminierung, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Germany}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
  • Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
  • We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks you can do. Please remove completed tasks from the list.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Agathoclea (talk) 22:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Arthur A. Goldberg

[edit]

I have nominated Arthur A. Goldberg, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur A. Goldberg. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. THF (talk) 23:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality

[edit]

I have nominated Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. moɳo 19:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World Vision sources

[edit]

Hello. On the English Wikipedia World Vision talkpage I wrote that World Vision is a "non-religious relief organization." I provided no sources for this. I still have no sources for this, but despite that I feel that this is one of the functions of the organization. Another of the functions is evangelicalism in the sense of convincing non-Christians to adopt the Christian religion.

I live near the World Vision international headquarters and I took a tour of their site in December 2009. I wrote about it on my blog but this is not a reliable source and I think it would not contain information useful to helping you with your article work.

I am writing you now to mention that World Vision has a museum in their offices. The museum is a chronicle of World Vision non-religious relief work talking about things like establishing healthcare, education, and civil rights programs. It does not promote religion, so the organization has a non-religious face which it can show to people interested in non-religious relief. I have tried to get paper copies of business models, training guides, and other internal documents from them. I am not sure they forbid sharing these things, but at least they do not make it easy to access them. If it would be helpful to you, I could talk to you about asking them for other documents, but I do not think their business model allows them to give a straight answer about when they do religious work and when it is not religious.

I would also be very interested to see the kind of documentation for which you are looking. Blue Rasberry 16:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all - the biggest Problem of en.wikipedia (and You) is not stritctly to discriminate between World Vision US (WV US) and World Vision International (WVI). Before we start I give you a short overview of the ties between them and the differences.
WV US holds the trademark "World Vision" and lends it to other organisations like WVI. WV US was found by Pierce who was not only an journalist but also an evangelist for Youth for Christ. So there is continuing evidence that WV US was proselyting at least until the 1980ies. But short before Mooneyham got president of WV US and founded WVI as an independent international umbrella organisation (It was intended to spend all the money while the national organizations should raise it). Since Monneyham took a lot of the WV US-staff with him when he got President of the new WVI he took the proselyting and the conservative-evangelical influence problably with him to WVI. But WV Canada, New Zealand and Australia wanted more power in the international organization (WV New Zealand and Australia are theological more liberal) and while WVI grew the influence of WV US ceased to a certain point (Nowadays "only" half of the WVI-Budget comes from WV US). In the 1990ies they established their Partnership which gives more power to the worldwide offices in planning the future of WVI. The influnce of the US-section ceased more, when the latest President of WVI moved his office towards London.
Meanwhile WVI, the UN, the UK, the Reda Cross and other global players in relief work created rules for such aid. According to this rules (which WVI signed) no proselyting is allowed while in disaster relief work. But no such convention was made concerning long-time development cooperation. So WVI as christian development organisatione uses christian local churches to do their work, if this is allowed. Where this is - in strongly muslim countries - not possible they hire non-Christian staff. But as far as I can see WVI does not proselyte active. In their core values they emphasize to be witnesses. That is problably: If somebody asks christian staff members about their belief and why they help they will have Bibles and what else is necessary. But they will not promote crusades or something similar. And third they work openly with christian churches in the countries of the donators. E.g. the built the Christian for the Expo 2000 or promoted a Gospel-Song-Contest on TV.

Most of this you can read in

and some German sources. But these sources are treated as not reliable by my opponents, because Whaites was a UK-staff member of WVI and Barletts case-paper is deemed not to be scientific because it is for students.

On the other Hand Balmer

  • Randall Herbert Balmer: "Encyclopedia of evangelicalism" Baylor University Press; Rev Exp edition (November 2004)

writes in his encyclopedia, 2004 the WVI would be still evangelical and include "Bible distributing, church planting and mission research." But it is not sure if he really describes WVI oder confused it with WV US. I found several such confusions relating to WV in his enyclopedia. Futhermore in Germany there is a special translation problem with his terminus "evangelical" because we can translate this word in two ways either as conservative protestant group called "evangelikal" or as protestants called "evangelisch" which both could be a mistake because other sources like Kristof

(And WVI itself) indicate that WVI is interdenominational including Catholics, Pentecost and all other Christians denominations.

Summary

At least WV US is a religious organization see Sylvia Spencer, et al v. World Vision Inc., but WVI is religious only two-third: In development cooperation and in donor countries they act as Christians (The actions in donor countries depend to the independent local office), in disaster relief work they act secular. But as a whole there are the binding core values of WVI which state that WVI is Christian "while being sensitive to the diverse contexts in which we express that identity."

I ask myself how far it is important that WVI is Christian. This depends on how its nowadays actions are Christian or secular. Therefore I search recent documentation on the fact that WVI is recognized by official US- government agencies, scientists or notable public newspapers as non-religious relief organization oder at least in certain projects non-religious-acting. Probably this is necessary to get USAID subsidies. But my skills in official formal English and US-law-terms and my knowledge of notable US-sources are to bad to research this on my own. --Diskriminierung (talk) 09:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you say is very interesting, and I might be interested in helping you find more sources, but right now my understanding of the differences between the organizations is not thorough and I have not had time to read the sources you provided.
I do feel like I understand well enough to support a change to the structure of the article. I am not sure that there are enough sources to justify having a separate article for WVI and WV-US, or for WV offices in other countries, but at least I think that it would be best to rename the article title to World Vision International, then create a section heading for World Vision US just to differentiate those two. Then later someone can add section headings for other countries or split the headings into separate articles.
Have you seen this article about the court case between WV and Spencer? The situation was that Spencer was not a Christian so World Vision US terminated Spencer's employment. This just happened at the end of August.
Can you recommend a source which compares WVI and WV-US? I think having that would make it easy to make huge changes to the structure of the article. Blue Rasberry 16:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I haven't been here around for such a long time.

Good Sources are Curran and Bartlett or Whaites

--Diskriminierung (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reality

[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Nufy8 (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really didn't consider my edit as nonsense. --Diskriminierung (talk) 14:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vote for Plano

[edit]

The article Vote for Plano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:LASTING; corresponding German article from which it was translated has also been deleted

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BDD (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2009 for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2009 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AlanS (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Diskriminierung&oldid=1139058000"