User talk:Diskos Aleksandrovac 2024

January 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Central banks and currencies of Asia-Pacific. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 19:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 00:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unbanning and restoring my account to normal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Diskos Aleksandrovac 2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. My account is not an sockpuppet or false. Can you please with respect unblock my account? It does not matter which one. I will not disrupt anymore Wikipedia. Thank you! Diskos Aleksandrovac 2024 (talk) 10:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to gravely misunderstand what sockpuppetry is. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unbanning attempt of my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Diskos Aleksandrovac 2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello again. Can anyone please accept my unblock request? I am understanding now that i will not make any sockpuppetry on Wikipedia web site. So i would like to be unblocked, but i will not violate your policy anymore. Thank you!

Decline reason:

Earlier today, you tried to mislead us and falsely claim you did not violate WP:SOCK. It's unclear from this request if you understand WP:SOCK at all. Once you do, your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply with your original account under the terms outlined at WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 13:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In light of the above unsuccessful unblock requests, noting subsequent block evasion via IP; 2A02:3100:59C1:8C01:15BC:BC0C:3D0C:5D4D (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). — Manticore 11:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked the /64 block for evasion. This is based on WP:DUCK. I very strongly suspect this abusive sockpuppeteer will continue illicitly evading their block. --Yamla (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Thanks for that. I also reported at AIV, as I don't believe there is an SPI case. — Manticore 11:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]