User talk:Discasto

Welcome!

Hello, Discasto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 12:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ecemaml. Thank you. W C M_email 14:46, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes? LOL --Discasto (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If indeed all accounts except Discasto are unused, perhaps you would accept to see them softblocked (or at least tagged) as such locally on Enwiki, for the sake of transparency and to reassure other editors of your good faith? ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Postscripts

Hello,

I believe you've been asked before not to use postscripts such as this in your talk page messages. It means that your signature ends up in the middle of the post, which makes it much harder to tell who wrote the post. WP:Signatures does say that the signature should be at the end of the post, rather than in the middle.

If you need to add an extra text after you have posted, please ensure that your signature is at the end of your post. If it's extra information on an already-posted message you could add a response to your own comment at the next level of indentation. If it's all in the same post, just add a new paragraph or similar without putting a signature in the middle. Thanks, Kahastok talk 15:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User page used for canvassing. Thank you. Kahastok talk 07:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing deletion notices

The MFD notice says:

"You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, see the Guide to deletion."

Please do not remove this notice from a page while discussion is ongoing. Thank you, Kahastok talk 22:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal

Hi, I saw your message on the discussion of this church is not a cathedral, but according to this source (gcatholic.org), the church is a co-cathedral, the ancient cathedrals are marked as "former cathedrals" and this is not the case. [1] --Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro (talk) 17:45, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola te deje un mensaje explicando el asunto de la iglesia en la página sobre traslado--Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro (talk) 13:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

en la Iglesia católica las iglesias que fueron sede de una diocesis aun asi no lo sean en la actualidad, generalmente son llamadas "catedrales" o "antiguas catedrales", existen muchos tipos de catedrales a) Catedrales sede de una diócesis b) catedrales que son alternas (concatedrales o cocatedrales) c) catedrales que son temporales (pro-catedrales) d) Antiguas catedrales (catedrales que fueron sede de una diócesis) e) catedrales sedes de una iglesia o rito particular las categorias de catedrales tienen la posibilidad de incluir a todas las iglesias que tuvieron o tienen esa condición hay muchisimos ejemplos en wikipedia y en las fuentes que cito. las Antiguas catedrales se categorizan como "catedrales" porque no existe una categoria especifica de "antiguas catedrales" y para reflejar que en algun punto de la historia fueron catedrales y que destacan por encima de otras iglesias normales, de alli la importancia de clasificarlas como iglesia y como catedral, pero cada articulo explica su condicion actual--Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NB that in English usage all the above may be referred to simply as "cathedral". Since the subject is of concern to more editors than the two of you (and since also, if I may say so, neither of you seems to have a particularly good grasp of English idiom in article naming), could you discuss in English, please. Eustachiusz (talk) 01:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Discasto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your editions on the page of Almería

I see in your contribs that you didn't edit almost never something related to the climate of any place. So why are you doing suddenly those changes in the climate of Almería? Just to bother me because we are discussing about it??

I find out of sense the changes you did for the ^{[citation needed]} cites. I mean, the climate is self calculled by the Köppen climate classification, this climate classification shows you how to measure and to find how a climate is based on the rain and temperature. Almería is exactly between those 2 categorizations, between the categorization of a BWh and a BSh climate, which are Hot desert climate and Hot semi-arid climate.

Then, senseless again to put a cite needed for all of the zone mentioned on the article as that famous AEMET map you hate, shows exactly the places in Spain with BWh and BSh climates. That map which you wan't to delete, shows exactly this and it's an official map by an official meteorology agency, so that is the source.

And for the 4th case, Seville it is the warmest city in continental Europe, not a single city in Spain, Portugal, Italy or Greece surpasses an annual average of 19.2ºC except Seville. --TechnicianGB (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnicianGB: In Wikipedia, anything is "self-calculated". Everything needs an appropriate reference and, if as obvious, it will be easy for you to provide a reference. Best regards --Discasto (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: My friend, I don't know which kind of acknowledge have you on the climate but in this case you are wrong. No references needed to calcullate the climate, as the Köppen climate classification tells how to classificate a climate. It's the job of an user who wants to know which climate a place has to use that classification and to calcullate by the measures they give mixed with the rain and the temperature of that place

And in the official AEMET map of the climate of Spain appears all of the climate zones... As also Almería appears between BWh and BSh, and it also appears all of the Spanish zones with the BWh. Is the famous map you want to delete... but well, in fact I will put the source where that map comes. Page 16 and 18... enjoy^[1]

The thing about the sunshine hours, rainy days, etc appears in the source below the climate chart... wasn't hard at all to find it. ^[2]

The same for being the only place in Europe without any registered freezing... as the extreme low is +0.1ºC which can be seen in the extremes page of the same AEMET page... So the only things which is without any reference is the thing that Sevilla is the warmest city and Almería the 2nd, but this is original research maded from a very big climate fan, after seeing any city above 100.000 inhabitants of the whole continent of Europe just 2 cities surpass 19ºC, Sevilla with 19.2ºC and Almería with 19.1ºC. This is common sense btw. See Template:Original research --TechnicianGB (talk) 21:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AEMET map of Iberian climate

Congratulations!!!

I hope that you are happy now. Si tú eres feliz, yo también lo soy. ;)

I hope that you are Spanish for the favor you did now to Spain! as you started all of this deletion thing and finally it will be deleted. Te felicito enormemente (I congratulate you a lot: translation) for you work for Spain, now you deleted the most important and accurate file which was showing the climate of Spain. This image won't be even shown in the page Climate of Spain as it will be deleted from Wikipedia. Job done, my best regards. ;) See you there, buddy. --TechnicianGB (talk) 03:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnicianGB: You've been given every single opportunity to comply to Wikipedia rules. Instead of following the rules you've kept on refusing to listen. You'll possible learn at some point in the future how Wikipedia works. Until it happens you'll keep on ranting and blaming everyone else instead of listening. That process is usually know as maturing and takes time and effort. Finally, with regard to my nationality... it's totally pointless. If being a Sparniard means that I have to support any pitfall by a fellow countryman... I guess I'm getting off this bus. Best regards and thank you for your understanding. --Discasto (talk) 13:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan Republic (2017)

The source never says that Russia rejects or not the Catalan Republic as an independent entity. Is neutral like Israel.--190.2.106.212 (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Discasto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Discasto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Discasto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove edit descriptions missing

Why e.g. this one? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/901582487 Zezen (talk) 07:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zezen: Just a mistake. --Discasto (talk) 09:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring then. It looks better now. Please remember to provide reasons for such dels. Zezen (talk) 09:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of national parks of Spain and their relationship to sites of community importance

The article List of national parks of Spain and their relationship to sites of community importance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no information that the List of national parks of Spain does not have and is redundant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.aemet.es/documentos/es/conocermas/recursos_en_linea/publicaciones_y_estudios/publicaciones/Atlas-climatologico/Atlas.pdf

[2] "Valores Climatológicos Normales. Almeria & Almeria / Aeropuerto".

[1]

[2]