User talk:DirectorG

Welcome...

Hello, DirectorG, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some useful pages to help you get started:

I hope you'll enjoy contributing as much as I do. When posting on discussion pages, please sign your messages. To do this, type four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message on my discussion page, by clicking below:

Click here to respond to this message!

Jammy Simpson | Talk | 21:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Vermont st.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vermont st.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vermont Street, San Francisco

An editor has nominated Vermont Street, San Francisco, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermont Street, San Francisco and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 15:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images - Commons

Hi DirectG. While I share your pet peeve for second hand smoke, I have another one: images uploaded to Wikipedia that should be uploaded to Commons. I noticed Image:Dabirds.jpg on Gull, which is the image topic I'm focusing on at the moment. I'll move this soon, but please make sure you upload to Commons in future (and if you'd really like to make me happy, you could even move some of your uploads there). If you want any help I have an account at Commons (see also {{un-c}}, a more automated version of this message). Richard001 (talk) 06:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Dabirds.jpg

Image:Dabirds.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Seagulls flying by SF skyscraper.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Seagulls flying by SF skyscraper.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:SecretsOfFortOrdTour1.JPG is now available as Commons:File:SecretsOfFortOrdTour1.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:29, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sunset Gallery

I removed the gallery like I've done so many times in the past. It happens so often, people take nice photos of sunsets and then attempt to showcase their media on the project but you have to remember, this is an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files. You have to ask yourself whether the images your adding really enhance the article in any way. The article is small and when there are too many images, it clutters it up. There is a commons link clearly visible there in the article, consider uploading your images there instead. — Possum (talk) 13:11, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Input requested at Sunset

Hi DirectorG,

After a quick browse through the history of Sunset I've noticed you've previously edited the page. Your input is now requested in choosing a new lead picture here. Thanks for your time, --Fir0002 00:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Table at Thomas Newman

Hello! That's a great table of awards and nominations you put up at Thomas Newman — it's informative and it looks pretty too. Just a minor comment: could you change the first columns to be "Award"/"Year" instead of "Year"/"Award"? This is for two reasons: (a) one usually expects to read down the first column and see entries for different keys, but here the years come and go, and (b) it's a bit hard to map the years to the corresponding rows, because of the gulf that one has to jump over.
I'd make the change myself, but I don't want to upset your work; also I'd have to do each row by hand, and maybe you're using some tool? Shreevatsa (talk) 04:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Shreevatsa! Much thanks about the table... As a big Newman fan, I wanted to establish how many awards he's been up for through the years with more than a little asterisk here and there. Yes, I'll probably try switching the year and award columns. When I first started making the table, I was thinking of sorting it all out by year, but then I liked organizing it according to the actual award. By that point, I'd already begun with the year listed first, so I finished it that way. It should be rearranged by tomorrow. If there was a tool to use, that would be great, but it's all by code! --DirectorG (talk) 05:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's even more impressive! :) Thanks, Shreevatsa (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DianneFHarrison.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:DianneFHarrison.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:DianneFHarrison.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DianneFHarrison.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CSUMB BBC01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CSUMB BBC01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 07:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CSUMB BBC02.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CSUMB BBC02.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 07:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]