User talk:Dipple-doo

Just an observation

I would like to make contributions. However I am sure you would be concerned that after your first edit you were falsely being accused of being a sockpuppet and having your talk page defaced with an accusation, and then told that you were not allowed to edit a particular page until you give a suitable explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipple-doo (talk • contribs)

Sure. Your first edit was a revert, with an edit summary, on a controversial topic. That sets off the alarm bells. You are now really labouring the point. If you're desperate to clear your name then this could end in a request for checkuser. I'm happy to assume you are entirely innocent, but my advice is still to leave it. Demiurge may not be an administrator but I am, and I know him to be a dedicated editor with a good grasp of policy. I seriously recommend you drop this and move on. When your editing history reflects genuine contributions and an understanding of procedure your actions will doubtless be beyond reproach. You'll also get a grip on why actions like this by new editors are questionable. Deizio talk 15:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)