User talk:Diphosphate8

Mariah Carey

Hello there. I'm Journalist/Orane, one of the Administrators of Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, and encourage you to continue.

I'm sure you are aware that I have been reverting your addition to the intro of the article, because you keep putting it back. The information has been once again reverted, and I have put it in the body of the article. Please let it stay there.

Mariah Carey is a Featured Article, which means that it has been voted as one of the best on Wikipedia. As such, it needs to conform to certain standards, or it will be demoted. The info that you keep placing into the article does two things:

it disrupts the flow of the intro.
The introduction should give an indication of what is to come in the body of the article. Stuffing the introduction with information of sales and who has sold more only serve to lessen the value of the article. It is not important what rank she is in the US. We already have two mention of sales in the intro. We don't need a third mention. If you feel the need to stress her rank, then do so in the body of the article.
We are not supposed to "emphasize achievements" in the intro. This presents a clear bias, and goes against our policies on neutrality (see Neutral point of view). (As a side note, we don't need four paragraphs of introduction; three is enough.)

If you have any concerns with the article, I encourage you to discuss them on the talk page of the article. Thank you. Orane (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

I am not as patient as Orane above, so, to keep it short, when you have been explained that Guiness corrected their error, please donot add that in the article, if you don't want to receive warnings or administrative actions against you. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Carey Discussion

Hello, I have reopened and restarted a discussion regarding the claim. am not trying to hide it from you, so please join the discussion.--PeterGriffin • Talk 01:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Mariah Carey

You've been reported for edit warring at WP:AN3#User:Diphosphate8 reported by User:TEK (Result: ). To avoid sanctions, you should respond there and promise to stop warring on this article. EdJohnston (talk) 18:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of twenty-four hours for edit-warring on Mariah Carey. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. -- tariqabjotu 21:04, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Diphosphate8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Have you tried to find out what am I being complained for? I have tried to talk to Petergriffin many times about not to edit his claim of 150 million records for a Chopard Diamond Award (which is 100 million albums, certified by IFPI, and it is what the original lead was) yet he kept on changing and reverting it to 150 million albums without a final consensus. He has been told by different users already not to use any fan website to support whatever he wants to put in, but he kept on inflating the sales and he even admitted the 150 million albums came from Carey's official website. Moreso, he had issues already before this regarding the claim of "best-selling female artist of all time" for Carey which apparently was given to Celine Dion in 2004 by World Music Awards and that apparently has not been changed as yet. He was calling names everybody in the Discussion page already, just because no one seems to agree with his idea. I have tried my best to be civilized here, yet I was blocked for trying to keep this page credible and verifiable. I don't get it. Diphosphate8 (talk) 22:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:Guide to appealing blocks. When applying for unblock, discuss your own behavior, and not the behavior of others. EdJohnston (talk) 23:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Merry Christmas

Please, join the discussion here. Max24(talk) 20:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Madonna

This was absolutely unacceptable and a borderline abuse of our No personal attacks] and civility policy, even when I warned both of you to refrain from attacking each other, if you can't discuss in a constructive way. If I see another comment like this, the above block will come, and this time it will be indefinite. We don't need disruptive users in Wikipedia. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:09, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]