User talk:Dionwr
Speedy deletion of Ryan Welsh
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Ryan Welsh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Cocomonkilla (talk) (contrib) 20:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Greetings Dionwr, I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Paul Malmont-- The information is presented clearly and is easy to understand. However, I noticed there are some holes that may need filling: the article does not contain in-line citations, and so doesn't follow Wikipedia style guidelines. Have a good day! Jipinghe (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Paul Malmont
[edit]Hello Dionwr! Good work on your article Paul Malmont - it is well written and contains a healthy ammount of internal links, plus the external links help with verifying the information presented. I'll see if I can work on expanding the article a little and perhaps try to incorporate the external links you provided as inline citations.
Anyhow, thank you for your contributions and I hope you decide to stick around! Please leave a note at my talk page if there is anything I can help you with. --Cerebellum (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)