User talk:Diogomauricio3
February 2010
[edit]Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Template:Alfa Romeo F1 worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Typ932 T·C 21:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page 2012 Formula One season has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --GnoworTC 22:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Diogomauricio3, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Diogomauricio3/Ford Racing 4. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
- See a log of images removed today here
- Shut off the bot here
- Report errors here.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 02:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Thiago-graca-couto.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Thiago-graca-couto.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Lisbonlogo2020.png
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Lisbonlogo2020.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 03:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Chorvette.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Chorvette.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 12:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Super-blizzard world of 2014
[edit]A tag has been placed on Super-blizzard world of 2014 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja talk 16:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Tour of Europe
[edit]A tag has been placed on Tour of Europe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Non-free files and userspace
[edit]So I've noticed DASHBot has removed a fair use image from User:Diogomauricio3/Vancouver 2010 Wii 13 times. Per WP:NFCC #9, the use of non-free files outside of mainspace articles is not permitted. This includes user space pages. Please do NOT place non-free images anywhere in userspace. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
September 2010
[edit]Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Eurovision Song Contest 2011. Thank you. CT Cooper · talk 19:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Your article drafts
[edit]Your article drafts such as User:Diogomauricio3/Turkish Airlines Flight 1267 appear to be based on fiction. I can find nothing on the internet about a fatal air crash under the name Turkish Airlines Flight 1267, and it is rather implausible that such a serious fatal accident would have no coverage. Other article drafts of your such as User:Diogomauricio3/Worldvision Song Contest 2011 also raise my eyebrows. Works of fiction that have just been made-up have no potential encyclopaedic value, and so should be deleted as Wikipedia is not a free webhost. Please review the userspace guidelines, in particular WP:UP#NOT. Unless you provide an explanation on how these article drafts have a potential encyclopaedic value, I am planning to nominate them all for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. CT Cooper · talk 19:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Diogomauricio3's user pages
[edit]All your user sub-pages have been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Diogomauricio3's user pages and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of your user pages during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the pages; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CT Cooper · talk 20:23, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
You were told above not to remove the MfD template, you appear to have ignored this. To be clear the template being referred to is: {{mfd|Diogomauricio3's user pages}}. This template must stay on the pages while they are being considered for deletion, and removal of these templates will not stop the pages being deleted, only your imput at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Diogomauricio3's user pages, in particularly how the encyclopaedia will benefit from these pages, may do so. Please note that repeated removal of MfD templates can be considered disruptive, and if you continue you may be blocked from editing. CT Cooper · talk 09:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Note
[edit]Your walled garden of fake articles has now been deleted. If more fake articles appear in your user space, you will be blocked from editing. Courcelles 12:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Marathon (Athletics) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. CT Cooper · talk 19:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Template:Country data Scandinavia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Template:Country data AZO has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:36, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]Since you have shown intent to persist in creating fake articles with User:Diogomauricio3/Expo Kids 2010:
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. It appears clear that you are not here to build an encyclopaedia. I note that it was your addition of false information in the mainspace which brought you under my radar [1], with your talk page editing suggesting you knew your addition was false [2]. I am jumping to straight to an indefinite block on grounds that 1) You have given many warnings, and have ignored pretty much all of them, so a block is long overdue and 2) Since you have been blocked for similar behaviour on pt.wikipedia, with an indefinite block given after temporary blocks failed to work. I would be willing to unblock you if you can indicate on this talk page that you will only make productive edits in future, and that there will be no more fake articles or false information added to real ones. CT Cooper · talk 08:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)