User talk:Dinoroar2665

February 2018

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Andy Capper have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 21:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is noncontrstructive about outlining what happened? It's all over Weinsteins page what has happened to him, so why is this different? No idea whats happening here and why this page is so protected

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Capper. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Capper, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 21:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dinoroar2665 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here what is going here? This man was terminated by Vice Media, do you need statements from people he abused to prove this is fact? There are articles about this. What are you doing here and why are you protecting this guy? If this is the case, you should delete Weinstein's rape mentions on his page because nothing has been proven. WTH?

Decline reason:

You've been warned repeatedly about personal attacks but have continued to make them. As such, I have revoked your talk page access for the duration of your block. At no point did you properly address your violations of WP:BLP or explain your attempted Javascript attack. Yamla (talk) 22:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I oppose this unblock on the grounds that his edits contained vandalism. such as replacing " seasons" with " seasjavascript:void(0);ons". CLCStudent (talk) 21:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My reasons have nothing to do with Capper. The edits contained vandalism which is not allowed here. CLCStudent (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOL what? You are a Capper honcho. I request that CLCStudent be blocked for bias.

Dinoroar2665, please see WP:BLP, and come back here when you've read the policy. -- The Anome (talk)

My reasons have nothing to do with Capper. The edits contained vandalism which is not allowed here. For this reason, the block should not be lifted or reduced. CLCStudent (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new here, no idea what you're asking me to do. Here is the article about Capper being fired. http://variety.com/2017/digital/news/disney-vice-media-21st-century-stake-1202642054/ and here is another one. Read the comments. This is a coordinated campaign to prevent people from knowing that Capper was one of the 3 people fired from Vice Media. http://deadline.com/2017/12/andy-capper-leaves-vice-1202227746/

As I said, you were replacing "seasons" with "seasjavascript:void(0);ons", which is why I reported you to the administrators. CLCStudent (talk) 21:38, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is seasons and seasjavascript? What are you talking about? I simply typed in the information..????

Dinoroar2665, did you read WP:BLP? If not, please do so. -- The Anome (talk) 21:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did. It's ok. YOu wont be able to shield the public from this info. More to come.

Help me!

NO

Please help me with...

Dinoroar2665 (talk) 21:31, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Andy Capper was fired from Vice Media. This is fact. Why are you censoring the truth?[reply]

Dinoroar2665, please see WP:BLP, and come back here when you've read the policy. -- The Anome (talk)

This is so not cool. I stated facts backed up by articles and you are censoring facts. No wonder wikipedia is never taken seriously by anyone.

You clearly didn't read WP:BLP. Read it, and you will be enlightened. -- The Anome (talk) 21:43, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Andy Capper was fired. End of story. It's in the articles. Good day mate.

and you are totally contradicting yourself. Cappers page requests edits to it so it doesn't sound so promotional yet no one is censoring it. However, you post the facts of his employment ending, and it's a violation. You are a piece of work.

- Capper was editing when I first put that he was fired on there. He said in his edit notes he would sue. They’ve actually removed his edit notes from both of them. Its the 8th of Jan and 27th of Jan ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.143.245.179 (talk) 16:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not even one of the sources presented above says that Capper was fired. They say that he left the company for unclear reasons. It might be that he was fired, and it might be for inappropriate behaviour of some kind, but the point is that we don't know and that we can't add controversial statements like that in the article if they aren't supported by reliable sources. See WP:BLP. Sjö (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]