User talk:Dinomarek

Stop adding unconformable information

Information that you added in page Scansoriopteryx is controversial. Website you added as reference is highly unreliable website and not useable reference, you should see This discussion. If you are curious about its ecology, it is nice to start discussion in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Palaeontology, and ask people to get better reference about that. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok now found this reference you added[1] is reliable, although format you did is not good at that. And I came to know that in the first place using Feduccia as reference was not good. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 00:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in article Alan Feduccia, have you noticed that I added Agnolin et al. (2019) in "Response to his work"? "Opposition to theropod origin hypothesis for the origin of birds" is not section to show responses, that should be in "Response to his work". Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

STOP vandalizing Halszkaraptor.

Over the past few days I have noticed you keep rewording the Halszkaraptor pages in a way that makes it seem Fabbri et al. support a semiaquatic Halszkaraptor. That goes directly against their inference. What you are doing is misrepresenting the source and almost POV-pushing. Please DO NOT continue this behavior or else you might be blocked. Atlantis536 (talk) 07:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

theropods which showed that Halszkaratpor had low bone density, a trait not observed in semi-aquatic animals except anser, gavia

https://theropoda.blogspot.com/2022/03/limpatto-della-densita-ossea-di.html Dinomarek (talk) 07:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[odpowiedz][reply]

Halszkaraptor was little waterborne because of its low bone density similar to anser. This is how it should be written on the wiki Dinomarek (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Psittacosaurus tail bristles resemble those of modern birds:

External and internal structural similarities suggest shared ancestry of basic developmental processes in feathers deep into archosaur evolution. Bristles possibly functioned in sexual display.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pala.12257 Dinomarek (talk) 11:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fabbri et al. (2022) showed that taxa with a high bone density are likely inferred as subaqueous foragers. This result supports subaqueous foraging in Spinosaurus. Yet, the opposite relationship is not true: not all subaqueous foragers have a high bone density. See, for example, Anhinga, a subaqueous forager with a low bone density. Note that low bone density is a theropod simplesiomorphy acquired well before the origin of birds and thus is not a by-product of flight. Note also that Halszkaraptor bone density is almost identical to that of Anhinga, suggesting that its bone density does not necessarily negate some form of aquatic foraging. In fact, high bone density is likely a SUFFICIENT condition for subaqueos foraging, but it is not a NECESSARY condition Dinomarek (talk) 17:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:264b7ca2-1190-4b76-ab93-074cedf897e1/download_file?file_format=application%2Fpdf&safe_filename=Fabbri_et_al_2022_subaqueous_foraging_among.pdf&type_of_work=Journal+article Fabbri et al. concluded that Halszkaraptor was low water because it was found to have a low density similar to gavia and anser . Can he write that? Dinomarek (talk) 19:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An animal has a semi-aquatic lifestyle if it is adapted to remain temporarily in water but still retains the ability to actively exit the water and carry out part of its life on land. A semi-aquatic animal is therefore not bound to the aquatic environment but is also suitable for exploiting the terrestrial environment. Following this definition, hippopotamuses, crocodiles, marsh turtles, many ducks and most of the so-called "aquatic" birds are semi-aquatic animals. http://theropoda.blogspot.com/2022/12/aquatic-dinosaurs-vs-semi-aquatic.html Dinomarek (talk) 15:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are starting to draw your own conclusions based on the sources you cite. On Wikipedia, that is what is known as original synthesis and CANNOT be placed on any Wikipedia page. So, no, I will NOT add that material to the page and you should NOT do so too. Atlantis536 (talk) 02:20, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365942329_A_non-avian_dinosaur_with_a_streamlined_body_exhibits_potential_adaptations_for_swimminghttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667123000526?via%3Dihubhttps://www.newswise.com/pdf_docs/16479539766283_Nature%20proof%20subaqueous%20foraging.pdf Dinomarek (talk) 17:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

. This has sparked a heated debate regarding the degree of ecological specialization in Spinosaurus, which has been described as actively pursuing prey in waters 11 , with alternative proposals suggesting a more terrestrial or 'wader-heron' model on the basis of anatomical observations and 3D digital models 12,13,23 . Aquatic habits have also been suggested for a handful of other dinosaurs based on gut contents (other spinosaurids 24 and ornithomimosaurs 6,8 ) or anatomical proxies (halszkaraptorine dromaeosaurids 10 , compsognathids 5 and various ornithischians 3,4,7 ), but remain ambiguous and controversial. This illustrates the inherent challenges of reconstructing ecomorphological relationships in vertebrates 25 and the resulting difficulties in inferring ecological traits in extinct species.Nevertheless, negative allometry in bone compactness (reduction of bone density with size increase) is found in flying taxa (volant extant birds, Cretaceous enantiornithines and pterosaurs; Table 1, Supplementary Tables 3, 4). This shows the importance of skeletal weight reduction in association with or preceding the origin of active flight 33 10 femur-midshaft diameter values for our dataset of amniotes with main lifestyle category as a factor using a randomly drawn phylogeny from the 100 phylogenies generated (same topology, variable branch lengths). Solid lines represent linear fits for the four categories. ...https://www.newswise.com/pdf_docs/16479539766283_Nature%20proof%20subaqueous%20foraging.pdf Dinomarek (talk) 18:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least write a human-like comment instead of pasting walls of text like a robot? PaleoNeolitic (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported to WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Atlantis536 (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being insufficiently fluent in the English language to contribute positively here, as per WP:CIR.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 12:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unlock me I'll get better Dinomarek (talk) 13:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you need to use the template in the block message to appeal a block. Also note that you are very unlikely to be unblocked unless you prove that you are able to properly contribute to Wikipedia. Michael60634 (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

t does not mean perfection is required. Articles can be improved in small steps, rather than being made perfect in one fell swoop. Small improvements are our bread and butter. Dinomarek (talk) 12:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What am I supposed to do to unlock me? Dinomarek (talk) 14:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions are above. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 14:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Address the blocking administrator's concerns about your conduct (the reason given for your block). As explained above, you have been informed about the reason for your block. You must address this reason in your request. This means that you must either explain why the block reason is incorrect or not applicable to your conduct, or you must convince the reviewing administrator that you won't do it again Dinomarek (talk) 15:13, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Upper Jurassic well Bedded to Laminated Lithographic limestones of the southern Dinomarek (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good example. I'm sure you're trying to say something, but the above sentence is utterly meaningless in English. What is your native language? Catfish Jim and the soapdish 17:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My native language is Polish Dinomarek (talk) 17:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poland is on my list of countries to visit, I have had a lot of colleagues/friends from Poland and have a weakness for kabanos! Maybe you could edit on pl.wikipedia? Catfish Jim and the soapdish 17:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What else can he do to unlock me? Dinomarek (talk) 17:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to follow the instructions above. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 17:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

halszkaraptor had a similar bone density with Anser which leads a semi-aquatic lifestyle Dinomarek (talk) 18:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions are in the coloured box above. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 08:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be blockbuster just because it has a problem writing in English. Nobody's perfect. Dinomarek (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to assume you don't understand the instructions. You need to copy the template {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} as it appears on your browser, replacing "Your reason here" with your rationale for being unblocked, then another admin will look into it. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which administrator? Dinomarek (talk) 16:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever volunteers to deal with it. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 17:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block Dinomarek (talk) 03:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

×

when you unlock me ? Dinomarek (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copy this {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} and put it at the bottom of this page. Change "Your reason here" to why you think you should be unblocked. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can clearly improve on the wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heracles_inexpectatus&oldid=prev&diff=1136703522&diffmode=source Dinomarek (talk) 18:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the block is no longer necessary because will make useful contributions instead. Dinomarek (talk) 17:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try this (translation provided by Google Translate):

Skopiuj ten {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}i umieść go na dole tej strony. Zmień „Your reason here” na powód, dla którego uważasz, że powinieneś zostać odblokowany. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 17:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason where do I want to write in the discussion? Dinomarek (talk) 06:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At this point I wouldn't bother. You clearly do not understand English. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 08:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been blocked for editing for insufficient proficiency in English. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

will make useful contributions instead. Dinomarek (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Epidexipteryx is small, Dinomarek (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Writing complete nonsense such as this is not helping to prove you can competently edit on the English version of Wikipedia. michael60634 / talk / contributions 00:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what helping to prove you can competently edit on the English version of Wikipedia.? Dinomarek (talk) 07:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have to place the unblock template at the bottom of this page. I've pointed you to this multiple times. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dinomarek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My reason for unlocking is that hat the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked and will be written clearly in English Dinomarek (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will format it for you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 17:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Catfish Jim and the soapdish: If the nonsense continues, I guess you need to revoke their talk page access. Atlantis536 (talk) 11:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Dinomarek obviously doesn't understand that this is a serious situation, and they clearly don't display the competency required to edit Wikipedia. The completely random and incomplete dinosaur "facts" mixed into incorrectly formatted unblock requests proves this. And as I'm writing this, I'm seeing that Dinomarek is writing the same completely random dinosaur comments on other user's talk pages. So with that said, their talk page access needs to be revoked. michael60634 / talk / contributions 16:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note to Dinomarek: I will immediately revert any nonsensical comments left on my talk page. I have also blocked your ability to email me so as to prevent spam. michael60634 / talk / contributions 16:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dinomarek is currently unable to edit on other peoples' talk pages from their account. If there is any evidence that they have done so since 26 March, give me a shout and I'll look into it. WP:TPA is specifically for abuse, not competence. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 16:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guanlong is is a genus of extinct proceratosaurid tyrannosauroid] dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of China. Dinomarek (talk) 06:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It does not mean we should label people as incompetent. Calling someone incompetent is a personal attack and is not helpful. Always refer to the contributions and not the contributor, and find ways to phrase things that do not put people on the defensive or attack their character or person.

Dinomarek (talk) 12:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The things you write on this talk page, if they are in correct English, are copied--including from Wikipedia:Competence is required. And repeating such pages to an administrator is kind of insulting. This comment, on User talk:Atlantis536, was copied from Beta-keratin or some other source. I see no competence here. Drmies (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]