Jump to content

User talk:Dinkar 108

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Dinkar 108! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 07:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! @Ekdalian, users @/Mahishya @/Andey murrey both of them are banned as sock puppets including my account. But there versions are still live can you please revert them on this basis of WP:BANREVERT. Below is the list :
Stable Version Vandalize Version (current one) and their are many others you can check them in their contributions. Dinkar 108 (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Boyinaroom. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kannauj without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Boyinaroom (talk) 03:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Brahmin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CanonNi (talk) 08:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! @CanonNi , Kindly see my my edit summary from the previous the current is POV of the user which is pushing with his two accounts vice versa and the given source does not mention anything which was written in the current version. Dinkar 108 (talk) 08:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Brahmin, you may be blocked from editing. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! @NoobThreePointOh , I explained about my edits summary , kindly please check that. Dinkar 108 (talk) 09:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied!

[edit]

Hi @Dinkar 108 I have replied on my talk page regarding Hemu. Thanks. Boyinaroom (talk) 10:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Doremon9087 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince Of Roblox. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 23:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BANREVERT

[edit]

Hi ! @RegentsPark @Ekdalian, @Fylindfotberserk users @/Mahishya @/Andey murrey both of them are banned as sock puppets including my account. But there versions are still live can you please revert them on this basis of WP:BANREVERT. Below is the list :

Stable Version Vandalize Version (current one)


Dinkar 108 (talk) 04:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dinkar 108 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know , I am blocked as SP of Doremon9087 and my other account were also blocked for the same reason but after Doremon9087 and 2-3 accounts , I never indulge in the disrupt editing , I always add sources and reliable sources. Only thing I was banned because at start I don't know the rules but now I know the rules of the edit. I not unblock admins can allow to respond and edit talk pages I can be helpful in patrolling other SP's. That's all I want to say. Dinkar 108 (talk) 05:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet of Prince Of Roblox

[edit]

Hi ! , @Ekdalian, @Fylindfotberserk there is an another sock of this [1]. i.e. @/Ekdaliann fan Dinkar 108 (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block. And frankly, if you want to contest your block, you shouldn't be doing it here but instead on the oldest account you still have access to. --Yamla (talk) 14:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got that and thanks , I will do that and also mention my old accounts on the talk page of the oldest one i.e Master Sock of all socks. Dinkar 108 (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]