User talk:Dimketr

Κατηγορία:[[Αντικομουνιστές ]

September 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Nikola Tesla. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Spinning Spark 18:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also notice this edit which again has reverted another editor without any explanation in the edit summary or attempt to discuss even though a thread has been opened on the talk page discussing the issue. Please take more trouble to interact with other editors and reach consensus. Spinning Spark 18:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome

Welcome...

Hello, Dimketr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 12:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization by religion

Regarding edits like these, please be aware that, per Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality and WP:BLPCAT, people should only be categorized by religion if there's already a reliable source cited in the article that explicitly supports their inclusion in the category.

Cheers, Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 12:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In any case you are now blocked until you start explaining to other editor's why you want to make that edit and attempt to gain consensus instead of simply edit warring over long periods. Spinning Spark 16:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]