User talk:Dimitri Michael
|
F Rahaman (Bangladesh) (talk) 22:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Dance Gavin Dance, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 02:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Dimitri Michael, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Dimitri Michael! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
December 2014
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Dance Gavin Dance, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- "Those were reliable sources from Dance Gavin Dance's page. You just decided to remove all of them for some dumb reason I'll never figure out. Why would you do that after I just revived all of their updates and info?" One of my "dumb reasons" is WP:RS. The stuff you're adding is trite and sourced to Twitter and other non-printed webby material. This is an encyclopedia, not a place for posting updates and announcements. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- ""The stuff you're adding is trite and sourced to Twitter and other non-printed webby material." Pretty much all bands Wikipedia pages have the same sources and other "non-printed" Webby material from Twitter and stuff and I don't see any of those pages info and stuff removed from it by you." Let's keep it here. You keep sticking material into other people's conversations. To answer your question: a. maybe you need to look further in my article edits. b. that is immaterial anyway. The content is simply not acceptable: we're not a fan site or a press agency or whatever. Drmies (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- For the last time, can you stop dropping your comments willy-nilly on my talk page and keep it HERE, please? "JDDJS (talk) 18:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC) so that's just it. You're just removing them on purpose when you said they're "immaterial anyway" for no apparent reason. I'm gonna revive whatever sources you've removed from the page but only this time its from my sources that I found. Can I do that?" You're going to revived sources from your own sources--that doesn't make any sense. For the last time, material added to articles should be relevant and properly verified. See WP:RS. Of course I'm removing them on purpose--that's the idea. Drmies (talk) 18:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dance Gavin Dance. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. One of your sources is Facebook, the other is a blog called Property of Zack. Really--Zack? Really, you should read WP:RS: these "sources" are simply not acceptable, and the addition of such information is, in the end, disruptive and blockable. In addition, this is utterly trivial: one thing says "no more contract" and the other says "yes contract". Blah blah. Why not wait and see if a contract is actually signed? Again: encyclopedia, not fan site, MySpace, blog, whatever. Drmies (talk) 22:49, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fearless Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brightwell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)