User talk:Dimitar2007

In case you didn't see the talk page at Burusho, it's only fair to warn you that I've asked to have you blocked at WP:3RRN for edit warring, with your only discussion being the silly pretense that the Financial Times ref doesn't say what it says. kwami (talk)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on October 30 2008 to Burusho

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The duration of the block is 24 hours.

Maybe I could add that removing 3RR warnings from your page won't fool anyone who presses the "history" button.

William M. Connolley (talk) 20:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitar, if you agree that we can add sourced material, why do you keep deleting it? This has gotten ridiculous, and you've already been blocked once. I've protected it for a day in the hope that you'll come to the talk page and attempt to reach concensus. The FT article reports that the PM and bishop greeted the Burusho, but also that the Mac. opposition derided it as propaganda. Either we report both sides, or we delete the entire thing. Also, this material is not very relevant to the article (it's more relevant to Mac. politics), and per WP:weight we shouldn't go into excessive detail. A quick summary of the events and how they were perceived, plus the link for those who wish to delve further. kwami (talk) 00:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guangzhou dialect

What, now you're vandalizing Guangzhou dialect? Is this an attempt at tit-for-tat because I won't let you get away with BS at Burusho? The version you reverted to is gibberish, and your edit summary is dishonest. I don't want to protect the article, because it is so badly written, so I would appreciate it if you considered Wikipedia before yourself and undid your revert. kwami (talk) 22:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dimitar2007! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 170 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Dzintars Čīča - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC) {{safesubst:#if:|== Proposed deletion of Granit (company) ==| _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]