User talk:Dimension10/Townsend string theory
Appearance
For those confused on what Type TS means.
All the nonsense that just happened.
[edit]Relevant discussion for all the nosnsense that just happened: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dimension10#Townsed_string_theory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimension10 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- For the record I'll post it here.
- Dimension10, I understand it's annoying to have people tag your article with the notifications at the top, but it's actually better to keep them as objectives to improve the article and prevent it from deletion. The issues are certainly relevant since:
- WP articles must have a variety of reliable secondary sources from a variety of authors, not just one author.
- "WP:orphan" is not a problem at all: it simply means that no or few articles link to the article tagged as an orphan. All that is needed is to add links to other articles pointing to Townsend string theory.
- M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 16:47, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Incidentally, if you want to write slanderous comments about me, don't make the mistake of thinking I can't see them just because they are in your userspace.Deb (talk) 11:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Clean up badly needed
[edit]There is no need to highlight the topic of the article each time it appears in bold. Some citations may be collected into one "multi-ref". I'll not change any mathematical formatting, but will clean up the overall appearance. M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 16:37, 12 July 2013 (UTC)