User talk:Dilipjadeja

July 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. regentspark (comment) 14:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilipjadeja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here This not a sock puppet

Decline reason:

It appears you've been busy making a large number of null edits to scam your way past extended protection put in place to prevent a large number of POV socks from editing a controversial article. Kuru (talk) 16:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Administrator

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilipjadeja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not a sock puppet, first someone blocked me by saying that I was a sock of some Shantanu and now the block is saying some Kiranmayi, I am neither a sock nor a puppet of anyone Dilipjadeja (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kiranmayi_pal. Yamla (talk) 13:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As clearly noted, please do not remove declined unblock messages. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilipjadeja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't even know whoz Kiranmoyi, I am not a sock puppet Dilipjadeja (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence contradicts this. Max Semenik (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dilipjadeja (talk)