Jump to content

User talk:Dileepvee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dileepvee! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dr.pragmatist and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dr.pragmatist (talk) 09:54, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan 12:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Mike Hesson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 (talk) 21:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

[edit]

Your addition to 2012 Sri Lanka Premier League has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

September 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page 2012 ICC World Twenty20 do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. jfd34 (talk) 15:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About Roger Binny and Stuart Binny

[edit]

Hi from Australia, Dileepvee!
I've made a few changes to those articles. I hope I have improved them. I notice that "Wisden India" is still a redlink. Perhaps you might like to work on this?
--Shirt58 (talk) 11:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012 continued

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page 2012 ICC World Twenty20 do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. jfd34 (talk) 14:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harbhajan Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I realised it now. Will keep that in mind in future

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bjelleklang - talk 19:42, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 07:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dileepvee (talk) 07:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have added ICC link to the story plus Tiger Cricket is the official website of Bangladesh Cricket, which makes it credible straight away.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Mustafa Kamal (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hack (talk) 08:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qantasplanes. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please stop removing infomation or you will get banned. Ok? Qantasplanes (talk) 05:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Qantasplanes I changed scorecard of Cricinfo as other sites notably Cricbuzz, Wisden India are 1-2 balls faster than them. If you still think that it was a better option kindly revert back their scorecard.
It isn't a good site who cares if it is 1 ball faster? And I probably wont even believe you since it is an indian site. Qantasplanes (talk) 05:32, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FYI Cricinfo is also an Indian site with offices in other countries. And Wisden is called Bible of Cricket for a reason. Guess you need to brush up your cricketing skills before writing something. Dileepvee
Oh grow up, Cricinfo is more realiable then that trash. I think YOU should have some cricketing skills. Qantasplanes (talk) 05:51, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah going back on Indian site word, we know who needs to grow up. Of course Cricinfo is reliable that even a new born will tell that.

Yeah we know you do, obviously. Qantasplanes (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also please use Qantasplanes (talk) 08:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC) when talking. Qantasplanes (talk) 08:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you promoting wisdenindia.com?

[edit]

So far most of your contriutions included links to wisdenindia.com, and in some articles about cricket series and tournaments you even have changed cricinfo.com scorecards to wisdenindia.com. Are you doing this in order to promote or advertise that site? If yes, please remember that this is considered spamming which can result in your editing privileges revoked. Wikipedia is not a medium for advertising or promotion. Wikipedia uses nofollow tags which means adding wisdenindia.com links here will not affect its search engine rank. If you are affiliated with that site, please read WP:COI. Thank you. jfd34 (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

wisdenindia.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Nopes not promoting any site. Just that I find the articles written on WisdenIndia more timely and of good quality. I have read the terms here and know about it. Just that I don't get enough time to update a lot of things from different places. Will keep this in mind in future. Thanks. Dileepvee (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC) Dileepvee[reply]

Sock puppetry

[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dileepvee. Thank you. jfd34 (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]

Reaper Eternal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dileepvee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I mentioned earlier, I have no clue with regard to a duplicate id used. I'm not promoting any site as such. Wikipedia has been useful to me in a lot of ways and has helped me gather info and increase my knowledge over a period of time. All i'm doing is giving it back by updating posts - timely and of a good quality. I'll rest my case here, pity wouldn't be able to edit or add posts the next two weeks if the present block persists. Dileepvee (talk)

Decline reason:

You're blocked for sock puppetry. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 08:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Max Semenik

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dileepvee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that changing links of one site to another wasn't acceptable and have since stopped doing it. As you would see from my contributions I have in no way damaged or disrupted flow of content into Wikipedia. I'll pledge that will not cause any damage or disruption in future and that will continue making useful contributions for overall benefit. Thanks Dileepvee (talk)

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for changing the links; you are blocked for sockpuppetry, confirmed by checkuser, and this is the point you must address if you choose to apply for unblock again. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[edit]

Hi Dileepvee. I noticed you were doing some work on the Shane Warne article, and that you've been doing a lot of work expanding the various Australian and Indian cricketers. This is great to see, but it seems that there has been a problem with many of your contributions, as you have copied the text directly (or with only minor changes) from the original sources. This is a problem, because it violates the copyright of the original authors and publishers. For example, using Shane Warne as an example, you added text that included:

... was furious that Samuels pulled back David Hussey when the batsman was turning for a second run. And when Samuels was batting later in the game, Warne confronted the West Indian with the words ...

Unfortunately, that is identical to what was in the Sydney Morning Herald article:

... was furious that Samuels pulled back David Hussey when the batsman was turning for a second run. And when Samuels was batting later in the game, Warne confronted the West Indian with the words ... [1]

You did make some minor changes, but unfortunately not enough to turn it into your own work. Looking back at your other contributions, I see the same mistake appearing quite a bit. It is important when contributing to articles that you rewrite the text from the original source into your own words, as otherwise these sorts of problems emerge.

At any rate, I'm doing what I can to check back and clean up any other inadvertent errors you may have made, and I'm very happy to help if you have any questions. You might also want to have a look at the copyright FAQ, as it explains things better than I can. :) - Bilby (talk) 07:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bilby (talk) Thanks, will keep that in mind when editing in future. Will try cleaning up old stuff posted. Dileepvee (talk)

Hi again. I'm sorry to have to raise this once more, but your addition to 2013 Indian Premier League was, once again, a direct copy from the Wisden article. Because of Wikipedia's licensing, it can't accept material that is copyrighted, and this means that we can't take direct copies of copyrighted text, or include text that is very similar to the original source. The copyright FAQ I linked to above is a great source, and should help explain things, if you get the chance to have a run through. - Bilby (talk) 11:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bilby I'll edit it and go through the FAQ and be more careful in future. Thanks DIleepvee (talk)

It is also unusual how this user never uses ESPN Cricinfo or Cricket archive, which is what we use in Wikipedia. Seems like he could be adv it? Qantasplanes (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Qantasplanes I think I have already answered that before and don't think i need to keep mentioning about not advertising any site over and over again to you. If you are aware Cricket Archive isn't an editorial site and Cricinfo is not always the first to break out news. DIleepvee (talk)
Wikipedia isn't an advertising site just to let you know Qantasplanes (talk) 11:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of P.M. Rungta

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on P.M. Rungta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bilby (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian cricket team in New Zealand in 2013–14, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Napier and Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dileepvee&oldid=1138282386"