I noted your unfortunate revert of the much-needed fringe template. I disagree with you: this is crackpot pseudoscience and as such "not even wrong". It is also using venues outside the physics community, including this wikipedia article to hype the bunk up and simulate mainstream respectability. This terminates my involvement in this nonsense---but it also confirms my dark views, and those of most of my colleagues, about the quirky, loopy flakey standards of science articles in WP, enabled by shoddy vetting. Getting endorsements by high school students in its Talk page does not scientific truth make. The stuff is not merely "controversial". It is meaningless.Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Dilaton! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Jess· Δ♥21:50, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
