User talk:Dilamm

Welcome!

Hello, Dilamm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 11:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do I proof that sources are liable, and what can I do, if I have the material in front of me but cannot use it as cites because it has been stored in an archive and is not available online? THX

Please help me with...

Dilamm (talk) 13:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)DiLamm[reply]

I believe the article on identifying reliable sources will help you. --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 16:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Regarding Wikipedia they are reliable if published, which they are. I do have newspaper acticles, letters and multiple exhibition flyer from the artist. Therefore I do not understand that they are not considered reliable sources, just because they are not published online? Thanks again for your help.

Dilamm (talk) 16:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)DiLamm[reply]

You need to prove that they actually exist, per WP:Verifiability. If there is no way to see it online, I don't believe there is any proof. --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 17:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I checked again, the archives can be accessed online. However, people would need to pay to do so. --Dilamm (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)DiLamm[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I have made necessary changes regarding the cites and neutrality. How does it work that they will be checked again and deleted? Thank you so much for your help.

Dilamm (talk) 10:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)DiLamm[reply]

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Please rephrase your question then leave a {{talkback}} on my talk page --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 12:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

Dilamm, I just to give you a heads up that your images were tagged for a lack of or improper permissions over at Wikimedia Commons. It's not clear whether you're the copyright holder, but it is clear that it isn't your "own work". Also, just so that you're aware, you can't edit any Wikimedia project (such as Wikipedia) with more than one account. If you intend on continuing to use the account (User:Wiedmam) that you recently created over at Wikimedia Commons, you must only use it there, and nowhere else. The same applies to this account. And if you have an account over on another project, such as the German Wikipedia, you can't edit on another project with that one either. I think the subject of your article is notable, and I want to see you grow as an editor here and continue to contribute. But you've gotta follow the rules. The policy that applies to this specifically is WP:SOCK. I'm still fairly new myself in some ways (and don't have any experience with Wikimedia Commons yet), but I'm committed to helping other users. Don't hesitate to stop by an say hello, or seek my help. :) Quinto Simmaco (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your advice. I actually only have one account "User:DiLamm". I did not create the "User:Wiedmam but was given the log in data from the copyright holder to add further information. I guess since it is the same IP address that is not possible. I will inform him about it. I am not sure though what you mean with "And if you have an account over on another project, such as the German Wikipedia, you can't edit on another project with that one either." Do you mean I am not allowed to log in with the same account that I have for the German Wikipedia on here and create/change articles? I definitely do not want to violate any rules and am happy for your help. --Dilamm (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)DiLamm[reply]

Wiki Commons issue has been solved. Thank you for letting me know.--Dilamm (talk) 10:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC)DiLamm[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Willy Wiedmann. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manfred Rieker (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject looks notable enough, but this article is kind of promotional in tone. Please clean it up and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manfred Rieker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 04:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dilamm, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bradv 04:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manfred Rieker (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Issues mentioned previously have not been fully addressed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manfred Rieker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 02:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manfred Rieker has been accepted

Manfred Rieker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yassin Sirri Hall

The article Yassin Sirri Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Self-created biography without credible sources. Validity of contents in biography is also questionable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]