User talk:Dil Khol Ke Gao

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jac16888 ^Talk 18:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dil Khol Ke Gao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1.The entire content written and posted on the page was purely information to highlight the working model of a music TV show. At the end ts all a run for TRPs and no one bothers about talents. More than music it has been a money making gimmick. Further content was yet to be added and it was not for any promotion of any company. 2. The content posted on the page was saved on a disk which recently crashed and hence whatever posted online was the only available data without ant backup. 3. References were yet to be added on the page as the latter is still under construction and being edited. 4. No where this seems to be promotional or has reference to any advertisement. 4. Its a request to review this again and please unblock the page as the policy was strictly adhered to. 5. No words or content was used in favor of anyone or any company for any promotion. Dil Khol Ke Gao (talk) 03:30, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a promotion platform or other means to merely tell the world about something, nor is is free web storage. Frankly that was some of the most promotional text that I have seen in my years at Wikipedia, and since you don't think that it was promotional at all, you can't be unblocked at this time. I must decline your request. You will need to read about conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dil Khol Ke Gao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As the reason stated by 331dot about the content being promotional, I accept the lapse on my part and will make sure there is no room for errors this time. I request for an unblock, so that the matter and content can be rectified and reviewed and refreshed as per the policies of Wiki content. I have gone through all the policies and request for an unblock as of now. If in case the errors still exist and found not in compliance with the policies mentioned then an appropriate action can be put in place. Will not contest that once again later on. Dil Khol Ke Gao (talk) 07:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say you have gone through all the policies. In that case, I assume you deliberately chose to refuse to disclose your conflict of interest, as clearly spelled out in the policies. You won't be unblocked to rewrite your content. You won't be unblocked unless you agree to refrain from all further edits for conflict of interest subject areas, and tell us what you'd write about instead. You will not be unblocked to continue editing your previous article. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dil Khol Ke Gao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As per the last review/feedback received, I do agree to refrain from all edits pertaining to conflict of interest subject area stated earlier. Would be mentioning the entertainment industry's highs and lows and the working module in general which will be purely for information and not for any promotion or favouring any company or product, not defaming or tarnishing any images and not linked to anyone's monetary gains. This will be a total new talk/user/article page from a fresh prospective and not linked to any of the previous contents or edits.Dil Khol Ke Gao (talk) 05:09, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am not convinced by this appeal that you are here to improve the encyclopaedia. GoldenRing (talk) 10:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dil Khol Ke Gao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can my words be justified if I am not allowed to present my views about what I want to state on the page and in this account. GoldenRing has mentioned about the convincing factor. As per the previous history I do understand the slips ups but after a prolonged study about how to write and present an article, the facts and conditions have been completely understood. Unblocking would only make the article better and would be totally in compliance with Wiki guidelines.Dil Khol Ke Gao (talk) 06:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per GoldenRing upthread. Reblocking with talk page access disabled due to repeat requests with no meaningful new information. Uninvited Company 21:49, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A TV Show