User talk:Difiicult
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]Hello, Difiicult, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I've just created this account for you according to your request. I did want to welcome you and provide some pages that you might find useful:
Introduction- 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help
Tips
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
I encourage you to edit this encyclopedia, helping to make it as good as we possibly can. I think you will enjoy seeing your contributions take their place within. I hope you will join the community of regular contributors who identify as Wikipedians! And consider it a proud association. We are proud to welcome you with optimism. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. I look forward to your contributions. Again, welcome! My76Strat (talk) 08:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Mongoloid were not original inhabitants, Australoids was
[edit]Though Austro-asiatic people were mongoloid who arrived from Southwestern China to India and mixed with the australoid inhabitants this is what genetics believe. Mongoloid in this context does not really mean people with east asian features like Mongolians, Koreans ect It's actually proto-Australoid who became Proto-Mongoloid. For example both the Ainu people and Veddas are considered genetically Mongoloid and very close to east asians, but they are not physically like one. Mongoloid such as Koreans, Chinese for example are result of the ice age which shrinked their faces and mutated their faces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WarriorsPride6565 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Most of your edits seem to trying to make points rather than adding facts or clarifying what's already there. If you can find reliable sources to back up what you're adding, it might help, as would writing in a non-argumentative manner. In an area that can be as contentious as Indian history has been, this is of prime importance.
Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Peopling of India, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You have been changing sourced text adding material not in the source, and adding unsourced material which so far as I can see is incorrect. Eg Acta orientalia: Volume 56
books.google.co.ukSten Konow, Norsk orientalsk selskap, Orientalsk samfund (Denmark) - 1995 - Snippet view Mehrgarh and the Harappan culture, then, since the settlements at Mehr- garh predate the date of the Dravidian arrival in India Dougweller (talk) 10:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 11:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dougweller (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Three revert
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.16.27 (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)