User talk:Diesel 10

Welcome

Hello, Diesel 10, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Onorem Dil 13:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sir Handel New.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir Handel New.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Season Pages

Diesel 10, I'm asking you to please stop reverting my edits to the season pages.

I am aware that you think the old format is more detailed. This is true, but this isn't a reason to keep it. It has 'too much detail', so to speak. For instance:

Each episode states the Michael Angelis and Michael Brandon narrated it. It's highly redundant.
You'll notice in some of the older pages that goofs are posted. This is considered original research - something intolerable here.
Each episode lists every character who appears. We already know who is seen in the season in the list below the episodes, and we don't need to know each and every detail about it. It only takes up space.
The summaries are way too long and revealing. Sure, we can give away spoilers, but it would be to the convenience of other guests to have a summary that gives the necessary info only, and not ruin the story for them.
The credits are generally the same for most seasons.

Here are some reasons to have the new format:

All the other episode lists here have the format. It'll create better consistency.
Brief information is much better, and easier to skim through (the TOC was fine, but we also need to take the page's size into consideration).

Your edits are good faith, but it'll be easier for all to have the new format. You can give suggestions to improve the page, but please don't revive the old summaries and notes. They only cause confusion (and, dare I say, delay) as the WikiProject strives to clean the pages.

--Rusty5 00:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please stop writing in CAPS for your edit summaries. It's very rude, and isn't helping you.

I was unaware that these changes were going on. I do not watch the Thomas & Friends pages as there are just too many edits, 99% of which are rubbish. However, I agree with Rusty5's attempts to clean up these pages, and I think the new format is a great improvement. The level of detail present before these changes was too high for Wikipedia, and there are other sites (such as TrainSpotting World :o) ) which will allow for much greater levels of triviality...

I have also made comments on my talk page and Rusty5's in response to others' messages there.

Diesel10, I hope that you will be able to work with Rusty5 in maintaining these pages. I trust his knowledge and judgement with regard to the Season pages, having seen the quality of his contributions over many months, in the same way that I was happy for you to look after the character pages, having seen your contributions there. These changes should have been discussed first at WP:THOMAS, really, but I don't think I would have suggested anything different anyway.

EdJogg 15:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with EdJogg and Rusty5. You're just doing rubbish stuff to the guide.--S.C.Ruffeyfan 13:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, this is NOT the way to build friendships here! Try some encouragement and, if you're careful, constructive criticism... EdJogg 19:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :( S.C.Ruffeyfan 12:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rusty.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rusty.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Angry Policeman.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Angry Policeman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SpitefulBreakVan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SpitefulBreakVan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:VicarOfWellsworth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VicarOfWellsworth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TTTETankers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TTTETankers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duncan New.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Duncan New.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skarloey 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skarloey 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Diesel 10. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peter Sam.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peter Sam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS

It is always very useful to back up your assertion of the name of the museum, and the anecdotal claim that 'about 20 years' can be reverted as it may be seen as WP:OR - always a very good idea to add text or a WP:RS that clarifies the various names..

ARHS and others have over time utilised:

Rail Transport Museum

Bassendean Rail Museum (seems to be the main flickr name for instance)

Bassendean Railway Museum

The current website for Rail Heritage also uses the longer name - see http://www.railheritagewa.org.au/museum/pages/bassendean/index.php

JarrahTree 11:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JarrahTree, added references including the registered business name. Was asked to make this change by RHWA staff.

Diesel 10 (talk) 12:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hahaha - in all fairness, you should not ever offer such info on wp - see WP:COI very very carefully, and also the fact that they have had in the past, the opportunity to be involved in wikipedia and showed lack of interest, if not diffidence... JarrahTree 00:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeead -

The point of over-doing the issue - wikipedia articles are not website pages - there are formal requirements in the processes required:

WP:LEAD is a summary of the article, not an evidence sheet - references should be in the body of the article, not the first sentence

the convention of having had different names, is to actually state them - also known as is a good way to offer info

RHWA staff in your answer is very telling - really if they had any good marketing sense, they could ask wikipedia editors for help, and a whole range of issues could be very efficiently exercised by a possible meetup/editathon - arbitrary playing with parts of the whole is ad hoc and somewhat lacking in imagination... there are numerous ways that material relating to Rail Heritage West and railway heritage of western australia could be improved and added to in a specific exercise. But then, as I say, its telling... JarrahTree

It seems you had somewhat of a negative experience with them. I too, have advocated improving the Wikipedia articles (I'd like to see the locomotive pages updated with better images for a start) but all of : my experiences have been positive. I think it's important to consider that it is a small organisation run by mostly older volunteers and one that is very much dependent on the educational materials that : they sell and attendance at the museum. As such I suppose they figure that their efforts can better be directed towards improving that material and the experience at the museum, rather than Wikipedia which : they may view as competing in some way.

I should also add that the Wikipedia page merely came up in a conversation about what the official name of the museum is .I don't think you should infer anything untoward...

Diesel 10 (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wow that could be a very trickly rabbithole that one - just because there is an 'official name' exists - does not necessarily mean that there is one name better for a title of an article on wikipedia - common names and found names (aka) are as important to identify in lead paraggraphs, to facilitate a 'capture' for anyone who knows something by nick names for instance. enough.

If the conversation was on a tuesday, then the possibility is that their knowledge (attendees) could be assisted in going through some of the old pamphlets that were created in the old days before the internet - I am sure they are kept somewhere in the archive somewhere... The more current flickr name and usage is essentially a see also requirement as well.

If there is a sense of 'competition' with wikipedia, nothing could be further from the truth - the point is that wikipedia content and linkages that lead to the photo library/gallery (for instance) in fact would improve linkages rather than 'compete'. The opportunity to have found out the positive of the linkages had been a possible opportunity in the past but it was not taken.

The aged volunteer is not unique to Bassendean, worldwide rail heritage groups have the problem of ageing and dying off enthusiasts, and it is always a very positive hopeful sign to see younger newer volunteers at any of the currently existing groups on rosters or on tasks that can share with the older members .

I am very glad you have had positive experiences with a rail heritage group (any group) as in most cases they are struggling in the current environment of covid 19 and the related general restrictions.

If you have any better photos of any aspect of any heritage railway operation in western australia, and willing to share them - the wikipedia commons (and then utilised on english wikipedia) route would always be appreciated - as all too often some enthusiasts have some great material but choose other outlets. There are always pluses and minuses between the platforms,

but if you have photos you would like to share or contribute - they would be much appreciated ! JarrahTree 08:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]