User talk:DiehardDanny

Proposed deletion of Stephen Baysted

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stephen Baysted, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Lack of references, subject doesn't appear to be particularly notable. A quick Google search revealed nothing on what would normally be considered to be reliable sources (news, etc)

The article also reads much like an advertisement.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Parrot of Doom (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stephen Baysted

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stephen Baysted, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Lack of references, subject doesn't appear to be particularly notable. A quick Google search revealed nothing on what would normally be considered to be reliable sources (news, etc)

Re-proposed as User:Varbas who untagged the last attempt was a sockpuppet of a banned user.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Parrot of Doom (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)