User talk:Diego Antolini

December 2017

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 17:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Diego Antolini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good morning Bishonen, my name is Diego Antolini and this is my first attempt to contribute to the Wikipedia project by submitting a draft for review with regards to a Group who has been working as independent research and study entity for fifteen years. Please note that this draft is NOT intended to promote or advertise the group, but rather, to let International readers know about their story, their sacrifices and their accomplishments in disseminating Unexplained and Paranormal phenomena. I am one of the founders and I thought I was allowed to give the opportunity to you as administrators to review my draft after its completion. I have uploaded most of the material but not yet the references. Please advise how can I continue to edit and eventually submit this draft to Wikipedia attention without being blocked again. If I need to change the name of the account, or whether I should provide more info about myself to show that I am an individual, etc. Thanks for your understanding, my apologies for breaching some of the rules of Wikipedia. Best Regards

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked until:

you propose a new username that meets the username policy
you confirm that this account is used by one individual only
you agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation (requested edits will still be permitted)
you agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose your paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
you indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Diego Antolini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Dlohcierekim, per your points above I have read the "username policy" and the "one individual only". It looks like it would be quicker for me to open another account but if possible I would like to *maintain the existing one and be allowed to change the username in Diego Antolini@ The X-Plan OR simply Diego Antolini. *I confirm that this account is used and will be used by myself only, as individual *I will not create or editing articles related to The X-Plan Group, however in the history, methods of Studies, and Media Presence there will be references of articles or other material mentioning the Group. Would that be ok? *The areas of Wikipedia I intend to edit in the future will be Human Studies, Science and Technology, and Esoteric Studies. Please let me know how I can proceed further. Thanks

Accept reason:

I am satisfied with your rationale for unblock. As your account has been renamed, I am unblocking this account on the condition that will follow what Dlohcierekim have said above. Regards, Alex Shih (talk) 03:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Globally renamed 'The x-plan' to 'Diego Antolini'. For technical reasons usernames cannot contain the '@'character. Just Chilling (talk) 21:32, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Alex, thanks for unblocking my account and renaming it. I cannot find the material I had uploaded before the blocking of my previous user name. Has it been lost? Shall I restart again from the beginning? I would also like to know if I can use this "talk" space to ask you and other administrators for advices as I insert the material, or not? Of course I am going to read Wikipedia more carefully and abide by the conditions posed by Dlohcerekim. Regards.

Good morning, I am reviewing the article I would like to submit for approval but I still haven't clear in my mind whether I can write about a Research Group I am part of (of course from an objective standpoint and with all due references from newspapers articles and organizations other than blogs) or only a third party can write such entries? I would like to have the opportunity to have my article reviewed by you without my account being blocked again, that is why I am asking. Thanks for your support Best Regards Diego Antolini

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The X-Plan Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The X-Plan Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bishonen | talk 17:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may also want to bear in mind: Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. – Athaenara ✉ 08:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Athaneara, thanks for the remark, I believe Wikipedia should be here to tell the world about the world with all its notable endeavors. As far as I understand, the keyword here is not ego, it is notability of sources. And that is my focus.

Your draft article, Draft:The Cry of the Sibyll

Hello, Diego Antolini. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Cry of the Sibyll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Cry of the Sibyll concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Cry of the Sibyll, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Cry of the Sibyll

Hello, Diego Antolini. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Cry of the Sibyll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]