User talk:Diecisiete05

This is Diecisiete05's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: JoSTrans, The Journal of Specialised Translation (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This would still need improvements such as adding better encyclopedia-information. Applicable notability here is WP:Notability (media). I'm also not certain if this is likely notable so I'm asking DGG for analysis.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JoSTrans, The Journal of Specialised Translation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:JoSTrans, The Journal of Specialised Translation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:JoSTrans, The Journal of Specialised Translation. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 04:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:JoSTrans, The Journal of Specialised Translation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:JoSTrans, The Journal of Specialised Translation. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 01:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Journal of Specialised Translation has been accepted

The Journal of Specialised Translation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 19:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Journal of Specialised Translation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Journal of Specialised Translation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 06:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Journal of Specialised Translation

The article The Journal of Specialised Translation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. None of the databases in which the journal claims to be indexed are selective, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Journal of Specialised Translation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Journal of Specialised Translation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Journal of Specialised Translation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 09:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]