User talk:Dicktheclown

Nice try- already got a new, clean log on and password from my favorite wiki-vandal page. I ain't a brucejenner sock, just an admirer of hiis work!!!== July 2010 ==

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anderson Cooper, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Anderson Cooper was changed by Dicktheclown (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-07-29T00:09:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:09, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Anderson Cooper. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Şłџğģő 00:21, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT is a WikiProject; his being included in it doesn't mean he's gay. That said, using offensive edit summaries is vandalism just like any other kind of vandalism. See the warning below. —Soap— 00:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Anderson Cooper, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Şłџğģő 00:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked

I've blocked this account indefinitely for continued BLP violations in edit summaries. I am including a block notice referencing disrupting editing so that you may have the opportunity to post an unblock request. I would advise against misusing the unblock template as that could result in the loss of ability to edit your user talk. Tiderolls 00:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 00:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Clownfilth for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Fæ (talk) 16:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]