User talk:Dibo

Welcome to my talk page.
Click here to leave a new message at the end.
Alternatively, you can add your message at the end of the appropriate section listed in the index below.

I will respond to a post you make on your talk page, copy and pasting your comment over. Please do the same.
If I post on your talk page please respond there to keep the conversation readable.
Add new sections for new discussions.

Older messages are in the archives.

Archive 1 Archive 2

There is a user I suspect of being the latest incarnation of a long running sockfarm. Another editor ran a checkuser, and it was confirmed, but the socks were not blocked. There is a SSP case lodged as well, I posted the result of the RFCU there and nothing's happened. I posted it at WP:ANI and it got archived for being over 24 hrs old (as if a problem being more than a day old ceases to exist).

This person has been playing silly buggers on here for ages disrupting others' work, there is proof that he is engaging in sockpuppetry to evade sanctions and yet nothing happens.

I'm basically getting a little sick of this. Dibo ^{T | C} 07:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there, you may remember we discussed this, the other night. Sorry I wasn't more helpful, at the time, and also that AN/I proved less fruitful than it usually does, for these situations. In any case, I've had a look over things, and I've blocked all accounts mentioned at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Elvisandhismagicpelvis, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tomasthetankengine, and User talk:Jpgordon#Elvisandhismagicpelvis. I believe that covers everything, for now, yes? – Luna Santin (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Change for Mariners Player

All I did as a general Wikipedian and Mariners Supporter was update his stats for the Season after last weeks game, and this was the reply I got from "Dibo"... "not really notable, appallingly badly written" Yeah... And im the one will "appallingly badly written" english... God damn dude, either get some english lessons or learn how to not critisize the work of others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somerandom12345 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's back

I thought he had actually gone for good this time, but I was apparently wrong: Special:Contributions/Bumchewer. Mark Chovain 09:29, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was odd... Good to see the wheels moved pretty quickly. All was sorted before I even saw the comments! :) Dibo ^{T | C} 00:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - I reported him to WP:AIV immediately, as he's an obvious sock of a banned user. He was back again last night, too (Special:Contributions/Poosnorter), but he's already blocked again. It's more effort for him to re-register and vandalise than it is for us to have him blocked, so I guess we just keep doing this until he gets bored. Mark Chovain 01:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Dibo you are my bitch. I provoked you back onto wikipedia. Now bark for me bitch. I own you. --Poosnortingsenility 03:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote for Football as the Australian collaboration

Hi -- I recently nominated Wikipedia:WikiProject Football (soccer) in Australia/To-do for the Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight.

This WikiProject has been inactive for a long time and with the World Cup coming up, it would be good for football (soccer) articles to be in depth and comprehensive in Australia.

If you would like to support it, click here for the project page to cast your vote

Thanks! Australian Matt (talk) 02:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dibo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The West Wing task force

Hi there! If you're receiving this, it's because you like The West Wing—I happen to love the show, and I'm trying to set up a task force for it under Wikipedia:WikiProject Television to improve its coverage on Wikipedia. If you'd like to join, please leave your name here—hope to see you there!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]