User talk:DiavadnyaInfo

Welcome!

Hello, DiavadnyaInfo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, DiavadnyaInfo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

HI, I have reverted you at the Daivadnya article but I have also started a discussion at Talk:Daivadnya_Brahmin#Sonars. I think commenting there is probably the way forward. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Daivadnya Brahmin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you attempt to hide what you are doing by using more than one account, by editing without logging into your account, or by making edits which are designed to make content which you have repeatedly removed less easy to find, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are still edit warring at this article, eg: here. Please read WP:NPROF and if you still believe the person qualifies for an article on Wikipedia then follow the instructions mentioned in the Welcome message at the top of this page in order to create an article. Until you have done that, the person should not feature in the list at Daivadnya Brahmin. Please also note that you should not mention their caste unless you have a reliable source that shows the person self-identifying as a member of the caste. - Sitush (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DiavadnyaInfo, what about "also note that you should not mention their caste unless you have a reliable source that shows the person self-identifying as a member of the caste" is unclear? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]