User talk:Dias cool

Image copyright problem with Image:Robin hood in series two.jpg

delete my articles unit x m16 and the viking age pls

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Robin hood in series two.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Robin Hood In Action.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Robin Hood In Action.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Robin Hood In Action.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Robin hood in series two.jpg. The copy called Image:Robin hood in series two.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Robin hood.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Robin hood.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:13, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Series2episode2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Series2episode2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Series2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Series2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Series2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Series2episode2.jpg. The copy called Image:Series2episode2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent uploads

Hi! I noticed that you've been uploading images without source information. Please review WP:ICT, and choose an appropriate tag for these images - you may also need a non-free use rationale. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs 22:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Hood (2006 TV series)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Robin Hood (2006 TV series) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Scathlock 15:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SBE Logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:SBE Logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Hood Series 3

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Robin Hood Series 3, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Scathlock 15:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Shed.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Shed.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shed Mk

A tag has been placed on Shed Mk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 15:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shed mk

A tag has been placed on Shed mk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Acroterion _(talk) 17:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shed mk

A tag has been placed on Shed mk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. A^RendedWinter 17:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Robin the outlawer.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Robin the outlawer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Robin8.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Robin8.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Series Three

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Series Three, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Scathlock 21:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Hood (season 1)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Robin Hood (season 1), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Scathlock 10:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Hood (season 2)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Robin Hood (season 2), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Scathlock 10:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Series2episode3.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Series2episode3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of credit management

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Institute of credit management, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: The Institute of Credit Management. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I have been very patient with all your Robin Hood edits. Incidentally, do you understand about the use of #redirect? However Demember was nothing but pure vandalism. Any more like that and you will find yourself blocked. -- RHaworth 18:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Series2episode4.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Series2episode4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Viking Age

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Viking Age, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. 212.32.67.212 15:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unit X

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Unit X, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. 212.32.67.212 15:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

M16 (TV Series)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article M16 (TV Series), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. 212.32.67.212 15:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Hawar

A tag has been placed on Matthew Hawar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 212.32.67.212 15:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Please do not add pages about yourself, or your plans on wikipedia, as you did with The Viking Age, M16 (TV Series) and Unit X. They have been tagged for speedy deletion. If you disagree with this, please add {{hangon}} to the page. Thanks. Stuart DD _{contributions} 21:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note 2

Please do not create hoaxes. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Stuart DD _{contributions} 21:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mummy3.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mummy3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Series2episode7.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Series2episode7.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lardners Ring

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lardners Ring, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Robin Hood Episode Nine. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Series2episode5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Series2episode5.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rome dvd.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Rome dvd.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oyster guitarist 17:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lost (season 4)

Hello, I reverted your edit that added episodes 402–6 because they linked to existing articles unrelated to Lost, had Lindelof and Cuse as the writers with the same citation, and speculated that Lost will move to Mondays. While you could end up being right, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I would not have a problem if you wanted to add the following. –thedemonhog talk • edits 19:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Series #	Season #	Title	Directed by	Written by	Featured character(s)	Original airdate
71	2	"To be announced"	To be announced	To be announced	To be announced	February 2008
Plot summary coming soon.
72	3	"To be announced"	To be announced	To be announced	To be announced	Febuary 2008
Plot summary coming soon.
73	4	"To be announced"	To be announced	To be announced	To be announced	Febuary 2008
Plot summary coming soon.
74	5	"To be announced"	To be announced	To be announced	To be announced	March 2008
Plot summary coming soon.
75	6	"To be announced"	To be announced	To be announced	To be announced	March 2008
Plot summary coming soon.
77	8	"To be announced"	To be announced	Damon Lindelof & Carlton Cuse^[1]	To be announced	March 2008
The potential season finale if the strike continues for too long.

Now That's What I Call Music! 69 (U.K. series)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Now That's What I Call Music! 69 (U.K. series), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Now That's What I Call Music! 69 (U.K. series). tomasz. 11:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of For England...! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article For England...! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For England...! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ducknish (talk) 23:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]