User talk:Diaphanousolid

Welcome

Hello, Diaphanousolid! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! OlEnglish ^(Talk) 23:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your question

Hi! Fair question and thanks for asking. Thanks for being nice about it as well. The problem is the lack of major third-party coverage beyond the official website, a blog and a site of questionable notability. Since this site isn't censored, it wasn't deleted because of the subject matter. What I can do is this: I'll restore it under the proper titling convention without the quotes and put a standard notability concern tag at the top. There are a few ways it can then go: It'll be speedy deleted by another admin, it'll be tagged as a proposed deletion after five days, it may be proposed for deletion by community consensus...or nothing at all might happen and it'll be expanded by other editors. It was a borderline call on my part, I admit. I wish you luck and I hope you'll contribute more. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BDSM: It's Not What You Think! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BDSM: It's Not What You Think! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDSM: It's Not What You Think! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]