User talk:Diane Redfern
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joshua Routledge has been accepted
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for May 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Routledge (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cavers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Routledge Surname Chronology AD 1400
[edit]I want to add content relating to 16th then 17th centuries. Should I continue on the current article or create a new article for each century? In other words, are articles limited as to length/words? Diane Redfern (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Diane RedfernDiane Redfern (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Routledge Surname Chronology AD 1400
[edit]Further to above-mentioned article. Question: Are articles limited as to length/words? In my Sandbox, I am currently editing new content relating to 16th then 17th centuries. Question: Should I create a new article for this new content or simply add it to the original article dated AD 1400? Diane Redfern (talk) 22:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Diane RedfernDiane Redfern (talk) 22:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Diane Redfern. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Routledge Surname 1500, from its old location at User:Diane Redfern/Routledge Surname 1500. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Routledge Surname 1500 (March 11)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Routledge Surname 1500 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Diane Redfern,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 12:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
|
March 2017
[edit]Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Routledge Surname 1500. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Routledge surname in the 16th century has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 16:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Draft
[edit]My apologies, I saw the content was roughly the same and didn't scroll down far enough to see that the newer page wasn't already contained in the older one. I've restored the content of the draft and merged it into the existing Routledge (surname) article. I can see no reason to split the content by century, especially with a "to be continued..." note at the original location. However, I think the page needs to be modified, and I've started a discussion to that effect here. Your thoughts are appreciated. Primefac (talk) 14:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your consideration. Your remarks have been helpful and appreciated. Much to learn. I will also "watch" the discussion you have started. ````
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Diane Redfern. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Routledge surname 15th to 18th centuries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allen Apsley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Routledge surname 15th to 18th centuries, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlisle and Charles Stuart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Routledge surname 15th to 18th centuries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipperary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Routledge surname 15th to 18th centuries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Anne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Diane Redfern. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Diane Redfern. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for March 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Rutledge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Nomination of History of Routledge surname 15th to 18th centuries for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Routledge surname 15th to 18th centuries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Linshee ☺ 14:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a very well-sourced and well-written article, however I don't believe it's notable enough for wikipedia. If it is deleted, I recommend saving it somewhere (perhaps a user page) so you don't lose all your work. We'll see what the other editors think though! Linshee ☺ 14:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)